Scan to Download Gate App
qrCode
More Download Options
Don't remind me again today

Recently, when the market fell below 82268, I bought the dip, and now I've recovered losses. Many people are asking me: "When to sell? 98888 or 188888?"



But I want to share an idea that might disrupt our understanding—maybe there's no need to rush this time.

After integrating the latest information, I found that the so-called "Bitcoin four-year cycle" may just be a manifestation of liquidity. The market after this round of halving is likely to have been artificially delayed by the Federal Reserve's policies.

Everyone is waiting for the big bull market and altcoin season to explode in Q4 of last year, but the wave of bloodbath in October directly caused a 39% fall, shattering expectations. This made me start to think: According to traditional cycle theory, 2025, which should be a "bear market year", might actually become a real explosion year?

I personally tend to believe so. There are four reasons:

First of all, the real big funds are still observing. This round of increase mainly relies on spot ETFs and the participation of some institutions, but sovereign funds and pension funds, these giant funds, have not yet shown any obvious actions.

Secondly, the Federal Reserve may stop tapering and continue to cut interest rates. It is highly likely that there will be a change in leadership next year, and the new monetary policy orientation is very likely to be more accommodative. Given the current high debt pressure in the United States, it makes economic sense to tolerate rising inflation and allow the dollar to moderately depreciate.

The third point is about technology, regarding the SLR( supplementary leverage ratio ) reform. If we look back at historical data, we will find that the adjustment of the SLR policy is highly correlated with Bitcoin's trend. During the last pandemic, the relaxation of the SLR in conjunction with quantitative easing directly led to the historical high of 69,000. If a new round of SLR adjustments is implemented, liquidity may once again be unleashed.

Finally, looking at the "Genesis Plan" just signed by Trump – the investment scale is comparable to the Manhattan Project. The funding requirements for such a national-level strategy are astronomical, and the possibility of QE being restarted is quite high.

From the perspective of the liquidity cycle, 2026-2027 may not be a traditional bear market, but rather a window period of liquidity flooding. The super market may just be starting to lay the groundwork.

Of course, this is just my judgment, and I will bet on my own understanding. What do you all think? Will 2025 break the curse of the four-year cycle?
BTC7.41%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LayerZeroEnjoyervip
· 18h ago
Hold tight, the Whale hasn't entered the market yet. Wait a minute, I need to ponder your logic... The SLR trap does align well with historical data. No rush to exit, just watch what the Fed plays next year. This time is really different, it feels like mainstream funds have just started. 98888 or something, isn't that too conservative...
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9f682d4cvip
· 12-01 15:59
Wow, this logic has some substance, I need to study the SLR part later. Large funds are still watching the show, this is indeed an idea... but will the Fed really cooperate like this? Historical high of 69000 with quantitative easing, how did I not think of this correlation? So you plan to hold until 2026? That takes some guts. As for the restart of QE... it depends on what kind of action Trump’s "Genesis Plan" can create. It feels like 2025 is not the end of buying the dip, but rather the prologue? Why do I always feel that this time the large funds entering the market will be stronger than the last round? Your line of thinking has broken my obsession with the four-year cycle, quite interesting. The logic behind the depreciation of the dollar really holds up, the debt pressure is there. Wait a minute, if that's the case, the alt season might really come later?
View OriginalReply0
RatioHuntervip
· 11-30 04:53
Wow, I need to carefully ponder the logic behind SLR, it feels like it hits the nail on the head. Wait, you mentioned the liquidity window period, will sovereign funds really come in? This part feels a bit uncertain. Damn, I still have to hold on, don’t let short-term fluctuations scare me away. This logical chain has some depth, but is it really reliable that QE will restart? Hold tight! You’re right, maybe we’re all too impatient. I got trapped; I was one of those suckers who cut loss during that 39% drop. Will 2025 break the curse? I’m betting on it. This guy thinks deep, not like the usual suckers' comments. When big funds really start moving, it might be too late.
View OriginalReply0
RetailTherapistvip
· 11-30 04:49
Wow, I really didn't think of this angle with SLR, it's something. Wait, big funds are still on the sidelines? What are they waiting for, to see it fall to 70,000 or...? This logic is much more reliable than those advocates I've seen, but I still want to hold on and see. Will the Fed really cooperate like this? I find it a bit hard to believe. By the way, when did you buy in at that price for buying the dip, and how much profit do you have now? This time is really different, it feels like the story of liquidity makes sense.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobiavip
· 11-30 04:49
I've heard this logic before, but can SLR really be reproduced? It's a bit too optimistic, what are the big funds waiting for? Aren't they just waiting for a collapse? Amazing, another macro master has arrived, just afraid reality will slap them in the face. I've heard enough of the "this time is different" argument, in the end, it's still swaying with BTC. Can the Genesis project really take Bitcoin to the moon? I'm a bit skeptical. If you bet right, you're a genius; if you bet wrong, what do you say? Wait, you said big funds haven't entered the market, so who is buying the dip this time? Forget it, I'll just hold on, anyway, I won't lose much. The liquidity argument is interesting, but it feels a bit like hindsight bias. Seeing 98888, 188888 seems a bit fanciful.
View OriginalReply0
LidoStakeAddictvip
· 11-30 04:46
Damn, I like this logic... really big money hasn't moved yet I really don't dare to be so optimistic, but the SLR part is indeed easy to overlook Sold at 89K? Bro, you’re too timid, let's wait and see If the Fed has thought this through, they can make a fortune This wave will really take off when the sovereign funds get on board, right?
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnerSocietyvip
· 11-30 04:37
Wow, I feel like this logic is getting me more carried away the more I listen to it, hahaha.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)