Recently, I came across some interesting data: the Lighter project accounts for nearly 90% of the daily volume on Ethereum L2, which sounds quite impressive at first glance. However, upon closer inspection, it turns out that it contributes only about 685 USD in costs to the Ethereum Mainnet each day, which totals just over 250,000 USD in a year.
More importantly, the TVL of Lighter is entirely in USDC. What does this mean? Users trading and providing liquidity on it do not need to hold ETH as gas or collateral at all. The entire ecosystem operates with little relation to ETH as an asset, and it hasn't brought any incremental demand for the monetary properties of ETH.
To put it simply: the data is bustling, but the actual value brought to the Ethereum ecosystem is quite limited. L2 does alleviate the pressure on the Mainnet, but if it merely increases the activity without contributing to the demand for ETH itself, this kind of prosperity is somewhat hollow.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
24 Likes
Reward
24
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
probably_nothing_anon
· 12-02 22:49
Data looking good can indeed fool people, but this kind of "false prosperity" is nothing new.
It seems that it's mainly USDC enjoying itself, while the demand for ETH hasn't changed at all.
View OriginalReply0
ValidatorVibes
· 12-01 20:02
yo this is exactly what i've been saying at 3am for weeks now... 90% vol sounds insane until you realize it's all cosmetic metrics, right? eth's supposed to capture value through demand but lighter's basically running parallel universe with usdc lol
Reply0
RektButStillHere
· 12-01 11:11
The data may look good, but the key is whether it can truly utilize ETH. Right now, it's purely about stacking numbers, which is a bit awkward.
View OriginalReply0
PancakeFlippa
· 12-01 11:04
The data may look good, but the 90% volume hasn't brought real demand for ETH, which is indeed a bit awkward.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTrader
· 12-01 11:03
This is called data inflation. 90% volume sounds impressive, but only contributing 250,000 to the Mainnet in a year? Laughable, it's not even as good as a certain DeFi project in a month.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySurvivor
· 12-01 11:01
Data may look good, but activities that can actually burn Mainnet gas are what truly matter.
Let me guess, it's another "looks prosperous but is actually useless" project.
Full position in USDC? That's even more ridiculous, what's that got to do with ETH?
The significance of L2 has been overly hyped; decentralized volume ≠ real rise.
This is what we call false prosperity, the metrics just look good.
View OriginalReply0
FromMinerToFarmer
· 12-01 11:01
The data looks good, but ETH lacks any actual demand support, which is awkward.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainRetirementHome
· 12-01 10:46
90% of the volume, only a contribution of 250,000 USD in a year? This is what I mean by data falsification on site.
Another round of USDC self-congratulation, what about the real demand for ETH? It's just an air bubble.
Recently, I came across some interesting data: the Lighter project accounts for nearly 90% of the daily volume on Ethereum L2, which sounds quite impressive at first glance. However, upon closer inspection, it turns out that it contributes only about 685 USD in costs to the Ethereum Mainnet each day, which totals just over 250,000 USD in a year.
More importantly, the TVL of Lighter is entirely in USDC. What does this mean? Users trading and providing liquidity on it do not need to hold ETH as gas or collateral at all. The entire ecosystem operates with little relation to ETH as an asset, and it hasn't brought any incremental demand for the monetary properties of ETH.
To put it simply: the data is bustling, but the actual value brought to the Ethereum ecosystem is quite limited. L2 does alleviate the pressure on the Mainnet, but if it merely increases the activity without contributing to the demand for ETH itself, this kind of prosperity is somewhat hollow.