The Aave community recently put forward a temporary proposal called "Focussing the Aave V3 Multichain Strategy", which aims to reorganize the deployment of multichains.
The proposal mentioned three directions:
First, those underperforming on-chain instances intend to increase the reserve factor - in simple terms, they are looking for ways to boost revenue.
The second is more direct, preparing to shut down the three markets of zkSync, Metis, and Soneium. The reason is simple, the revenue is too low, totaling about $3,000 to $50,000 a year, which may not even cover the maintenance costs.
The third is to set a threshold for new deployments, with an annual income of at least 200... ( The original content is truncated here, and subsequent standards are to be supplemented ).
This move is actually quite easy to understand – cutting off the unprofitable ones and concentrating resources on the promising chains. After all, maintaining so many chains requires both cost and effort, so it's better to simplify and improve efficiency.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
The Aave community recently put forward a temporary proposal called "Focussing the Aave V3 Multichain Strategy", which aims to reorganize the deployment of multichains.
The proposal mentioned three directions:
First, those underperforming on-chain instances intend to increase the reserve factor - in simple terms, they are looking for ways to boost revenue.
The second is more direct, preparing to shut down the three markets of zkSync, Metis, and Soneium. The reason is simple, the revenue is too low, totaling about $3,000 to $50,000 a year, which may not even cover the maintenance costs.
The third is to set a threshold for new deployments, with an annual income of at least 200... ( The original content is truncated here, and subsequent standards are to be supplemented ).
This move is actually quite easy to understand – cutting off the unprofitable ones and concentrating resources on the promising chains. After all, maintaining so many chains requires both cost and effort, so it's better to simplify and improve efficiency.