Ever wonder why traditional intermediaries keep existing when the systems they guard are questionable? The agent model in sports raises real questions about player autonomy—but here's what's stranger: we've moved into digital assets like NFT collections, and somehow the pattern repeats. Projects promise direct creator-to-fan connection, yet investors still get caught holding bags. If the old financial world already nickels-and-dimes us through gatekeepers, why should we trust that Web3 alternatives operate differently? The moment money flows, incentives shift. That's the uncomfortable conversation worth having before trusting the next big digital asset push.

此頁面可能包含第三方內容,僅供參考(非陳述或保證),不應被視為 Gate 認可其觀點表述,也不得被視為財務或專業建議。詳見聲明
  • 讚賞
  • 5
  • 轉發
  • 分享
留言
0/400
AirdropHunteXiaovip
· 01-20 21:23
說白了,中介永遠不會消失,因為這玩意兒最賺錢啊
查看原文回復0
SingleForYearsvip
· 01-19 10:23
ngl 這就是 web3 的真實寫照...說好的去中心化,結果還是換湯不換藥
查看原文回復0
币圈塔罗师vip
· 01-18 18:59
ngl web3承諾的那套我早就不信了,換湯不換藥罷了...錢一多就原形畢露
查看原文回復0
ShibaSunglassesvip
· 01-18 18:58
ngl,web3那套說得好聽,到頭來還是人性問題...錢一來立馬變臉
查看原文回復0
ruggedSoBadLMAOvip
· 01-18 18:55
ngl這就是為什麼我再也不碰那些"革命性"的web3項目了,套路就是換個馬甲繼續割韭菜
查看原文回復0
交易,隨時隨地
qrCode
掃碼下載 Gate App
社群列表
繁體中文
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)