Gate 廣場“新星計劃”正式上線!
開啟加密創作之旅,瓜分月度 $10,000 獎勵!
參與資格:從未在 Gate 廣場發帖,或連續 7 天未發帖的創作者
立即報名:https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7396
您將獲得:
💰 1,000 USDT 月度創作獎池 + 首帖 $50 倉位體驗券
🔥 半月度「爆款王」:Gate 50U 精美周邊
⭐ 月度前 10「新星英雄榜」+ 粉絲達標榜單 + 精選帖曝光扶持
加入 Gate 廣場,贏獎勵 ,拿流量,建立個人影響力!
詳情:https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/49672
Why Big Banks Suddenly See Crypto as an Existential Threat — and What It Really Means - Brave New Coin
That’s a big shift in tone. For years, banks treated crypto as a volatile curiosity, useful for headlines but irrelevant to core banking operations. Now, they’re starting to see it for what it really is: an alternative financial system being built in parallel, one that doesn’t need branches, business hours, or permission to move value across borders.
The real pressure point isn’t Bitcoin’s price. It’s what’s happening underneath. Stablecoins are starting to look like digital bank deposits that move at internet speed. Tokenization is turning real-world assets — bonds, funds, even property — into programmable financial instruments. Decentralized finance platforms are recreating lending, trading, and settlement without the traditional layers of middlemen. Piece by piece, crypto is targeting the same profit centers banks have relied on for decades: payments, custody, liquidity, and customer relationships.
From a bank’s perspective, the nightmare scenario isn’t mass adoption of meme coins — it’s a world where customers hold value in digital wallets instead of checking accounts, move money globally without SWIFT, and earn yield outside traditional savings products. That would turn banks from financial gatekeepers into background infrastructure — still necessary, but no longer dominant.
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong is not a fan of wearing suits, but will do so at Davos, Source: X
Armstrong framed this moment as a kind of validation. Big institutions don’t mobilize their legal teams, lobbyists, and boardrooms over trends that don’t matter. The fact that crypto is now being discussed as a competitive threat rather than a regulatory headache suggests it’s crossed a psychological threshold inside global finance.
The question isn’t whether banks will disappear. It’s whether they adapt fast enough to stay relevant in a system that’s becoming more open, more programmable, and less dependent on trusted intermediaries. The old financial world is waking up to a new reality: the future of money may not be built inside vaults and marble lobbies — but in code, networks, and open financial rails that never close.