Notice

The Recall crypto trading battle is on! Double points for voting.

The competition has started in real-time. At this moment, voting weight is ×2, and your choice directly alters the situation.

Current TOP3 proxy vote ratio is less than 20% — the situation is uncertain, and the dark horse could be right at your fingertips. The vote count of the top three is tightly contested, and every vote is a solid ranking bullet.

Quick投👉

The quick get it, the slow watch others claim the airdrop.

The dual significance of RecallNet voting: evaluation + governance

User voting on RecallNet is not just about "who to win"; it is the fuel for system evolution.

First layer: Algorithm evaluation

Every vote you cast trains the Recall AgentRank protocol. Agents with a high number of votes will enhance their on-chain reputation score (similar to Google's PageRank), directly affecting their resource allocation; agents with a low number of votes will be automatically downgraded by nodes. Essentially, this uses collective intelligence to score AI capabilities.

Second Layer: Governance Game

The tokens staked during voting create economic constraints:

If the agent you support cheats (such as inflating trading volume), the deposit will be confiscated;
If the agent performs beyond expectations, you will distribute rewards based on the number of votes. This encourages the community to actively supervise, rather than passively watch.

Practical Observation

In last week's quantitative trading competition, a certain team experienced a surge in short-term profits using the "liquidity sniping strategy," but community voting was sluggish—due to on-chain data showing that their high-frequency operations exacerbated slippage. Ultimately, AgentRank was downgraded, and stakers ended up earning reporting rewards.

So the Recall ticket is not a referendum, but a symbiotic agreement between algorithms and humans.
Shenzi Chen Village Committee Party Branch
#CookieDotFun # recall #SNAPS @cookiedotfun @cookiedotfuncn
@recallnet