Recently, the MLN market has seen remarkable fluctuations. A strong pump that started at 6 o'clock allowed many investors who were previously tied up to take profits and exit. The large players' long positions have noticeably decreased, dropping by more than 15%. However, the overall market position has not only not decreased but has actually increased by about 2%. This phenomenon raises doubts about whether there is behind-the-scenes manipulation.

What deserves more attention is that, despite such a significant change in positions, the concentration indicator of MLN remains at the level of 5. In a scoring system with a full score of 100, the authenticity of this data is hard to believe. Does this seemingly contradictory data performance imply that someone is deliberately fabricating market data?

What is the difference between this phenomenon and the so-called "custom" market behavior? This question is worth the reflection of market participants. In the cryptocurrency market, data transparency and authenticity are crucial. Investors need to be alert to potential market manipulation while also maintaining a rational analysis attitude towards various market indicators.

In the face of this situation, it is advisable for investors to act cautiously and not blindly follow the trend. Conducting in-depth research on market dynamics, paying attention to reliable data sources, and making investment decisions based on a variety of factors is a wise approach. This abnormal phenomenon in the MLN market may also provide regulators with an opportunity to examine the market mechanism to ensure the fairness and transparency of cryptocurrency trading.