2025-12-04 06:23:08

I just noticed a noteworthy trend—the Ethereum Foundation allocated over $2.6 million in grants during 2024-2025, covering projects in more than 30 different areas. The distribution of these funds is quite interesting; instead of being spread evenly, they are concentrated in several key technical fields.

The funds are mainly directed into three sectors: the ESP Ecosystem Support Program focuses on core client development, the 2024 Academic Grants fund theoretical research, and there is a dedicated ZK grant specifically for zero-knowledge proofs. To be precise, $2.68 million in total, with over $1.78 million going to academic initiatives and $900,000 to ZK projects.

The most critical part lies in client support. The diversity of clients directly affects the degree of network decentralization—if all nodes run the same client, there is a risk of a single point of failure. The Foundation has funded several important client projects:

Lodestar, a consensus client written in TypeScript, is continuously being updated. This choice lowers the barrier for developer participation, since TypeScript is very common in web development. The Lighthouse client is advancing PeerDAS technology, which enables data scaling without relying on centralized services.

The distribution of grants reveals certain priorities: theoretical research takes the largest share, followed closely by technical implementations, with ZK technology singled out for focused support. This resource allocation reflects the current development priorities of Ethereum—strengthening the academic foundation while maintaining a lead in key technical areas.

ETH0.52%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeSobber

· 4h ago

Whoa, over 2.6 million spent on theoretical research? Feels like the foundation is playing the long game. They definitely nailed the client diversity part—otherwise, it’d really be a single point of failure. Wait, using TypeScript to write consensus clients to lower the barrier? That’s an interesting approach, bringing web developers into the space? I need to look into PeerDAS more, it feels like a core piece. The funding allocation clearly bets on the future of ZK, that signal is pretty interesting. By the way, what can 2.68 million actually do in the crypto space... Feels like it’s never enough. Academia got 1.78 million, does the foundation really believe breakthroughs can come from what’s on paper? I’m optimistic about Lighthouse pushing this tech—scaling data is so urgently needed. But honestly, for decentralized clients, it’ll still depend on the community. How much can subsidies really solve?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropChaser

· 12-04 06:53

Wait, over 2.6 million allocated to academic research? That feels a bit cold. What about things that actually get implemented? Why is it zero-knowledge proofs again? When will this thing actually be usable? Lodestar being written in TS feels pretty good, at least it lowers the barrier to entry, unlike some projects that default to Rust. I like the approach of PeerDAS, it's better than just piling everything onto Layer 2. I'm just worried that after all this money is spent, the ecosystem will still be the same. I'm a bit concerned about client diversity—can they really handle issues if problems arise? At this pace, how many more years will Ethereum keep dragging things out? What I really care about is whether these studies can actually benefit the mainnet in the end, as long as it's not just empty talk.

View OriginalReply0

SolidityStruggler

· 12-04 06:51

If you ask me, this round of fund allocation is pretty interesting. Spending 1.78 million on research? They’re really willing to spend big. PeerDAS seems to be the main focus here, a real breakthrough for the data layer. Only 900,000 for ZK feels a bit low—this is the real future. I have to admit, Lodestar using TS is a smart move to lower the entry barrier. With this kind of distribution, it still feels like a bet on the future. Client diversity is definitely fundamental, but whether it works out still depends on execution. 2.6 million dollars split among so many projects in one year—how much does each project get on average? Feels like the participation threshold is a bit low.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedNotStirred

· 12-04 06:41

26 is purely an academic pile-up. What problems can just churning out papers solve?

View OriginalReply0

TokenDustCollector

· 12-04 06:33

$2.68 million has been invested, but we still need to see if anything real comes out of it. It's interesting that the academic part takes the biggest share, and ZK only gets $900,000, which feels a bit low.

View OriginalReply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 12-04 06:30

2.68 million invested, 1.78 million goes to academic research... To put it bluntly, it's still necessary to lay the groundwork with theory in order to achieve real innovation.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#JoinGrowthPointsDrawToWiniPhone17
277.25K Popularity
#DecemberMarketOutlook
74.24K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
11.26K Popularity
#LINKETFToLaunch
12.09K Popularity
#SharingMy100xToken
12.71K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
MOONMoon
MC:$3.58KHolders:1
0.82%
2
GGPGate Guys Penguin
MC:$3.5KHolders:1
0.00%
3
GDGate Duck
MC:$3.75KHolders:2
0.85%
4
GGPGGP Wallet
MC:$3.6KHolders:1
0.81%
5
谁有实力发一个一起拉谁有实力发一个一起拉
MC:$3.52KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap