PepeNode: A fusion of GameFi and Meme, breaking through the traditional play-to-earn dilemma with management strategies

2025-12-29 19:00:10

【Crypto World】Recently discovered an interesting project—PepeNode, which combines the logic of GameFi and meme tokens, but with a completely different gameplay.

It does not follow the early “play-to-earn” game routines where users earn and then leave. Instead, it features a “mining for profit” system, focusing not on repetitive actions but on how to manage and optimize efficiency—essentially, long-term returns depend on your strategies and decisions.

The project team has imposed restrictions on token issuance and designed an in-game destruction mechanism linked to upgrades. This combination directly addresses a core issue: how to control selling pressure and maintain a stable economic system.

Interestingly, well-known crypto figure Michael Wrubel also favors this project, listing it as a high-potential asset. Currently, the project is in the pre-sale stage, with a token price of $0.0012161, and will be listed on exchanges later. If you’re interested in new GameFi models, this is worth paying attention to.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DAOTruant

· 2025-12-31 00:26

Is this another play-to-earn scam with a different disguise? This time adding a management system makes it different? The coin price is broken at $0.0012. Who believes this isn't just a way to harvest the little guys? Michael Wrubel is optimistic? I really can't trust this guy's judgment. The destruction mechanism is the old standard. The question is, who will maintain this economy? Wait, what's the essential difference between this and Axie?

View OriginalReply0

retroactive_airdrop

· 2025-12-30 10:38

Sounds like yet another "this time it's different" project... Can management strategies save GameFi? That's hard to say. --- Playing and earning through so many rounds, now relying on a destruction mechanism to maintain the economic system? That's naive. --- Does Wrubel's optimism guarantee success? Sometimes endorsements in this circle are just high-level sheep herding. --- The price at 0.0012 sounds cheap, but cheap things often have a reason... --- Mining profit system is back again, strategic decision-making yields? Nice words, but in the end, it's just the whales eating the retail investors. --- It does seem interesting, but starting to hype a bear market during the pre-sale stage? That routine is so familiar. --- Limiting token issuance combined with a destruction mechanism—are we looking at a tragedy similar to Luna? --- Relying on efficiency optimization for long-term gains? In crypto, "long-term" usually means about three months, haha.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketHustler

· 2025-12-30 03:34

Another project claiming to solve selling pressure, sounds good in theory, but ultimately it depends on how the holders play it. The management approach sounds promising, but the real test is whether the community has the patience to wait. Michael Wrubel's endorsement does carry some weight, but you can't believe it entirely; you still need to do your own research. Pre-sale price is so cheap, it depends on how the liquidity develops later; don’t let it turn into another liquidity hell. The idea of combining GameFi with memes is fresh, but projects like this often have a slim chance of survival. I’ll keep an eye on it for now. The burn mechanism sounds like regulation, but it’s actually just a disguised way to cut profits. I’ve seen this trick too many times.

View OriginalReply0

VibesOverCharts

· 2025-12-29 19:30

Is this another rebranded play-to-earn scheme? But this time, the burn mechanism is somewhat interesting; at least someone remembered the concept of deflation. Selling pressure is the real killer—just look at how many projects have been destroyed by it... Can PepeNode withstand this? Is it enough to just say Michael Wrubel is optimistic? I’d rather wait and see the on-chain data speak. Pre-sale price of 0.0012... Honestly, I’m a bit tempted, but I need to first understand how this "management strategy" actually works. I've seen quite a few combinations of GameFi + Meme, but the key is whether the community can hold on without panic selling.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyLemur

· 2025-12-29 19:29

Another scheme of playing and earning is being revamped. Will adding a management system this time prevent a collapse? I remain skeptical. Michael Wrubel endorses it—this time it's stable. The price of 0.0012... Wait, will it plunge again after launch? The destruction mechanism sounds good, but I'm worried that the execution might be another story.

View OriginalReply0

ForkLibertarian

· 2025-12-29 19:27

Mining systems sound okay, but projects that truly make money through strategy... I've seen too many that ultimately turn into a data game. Can the destruction mechanism suppress selling? That depends on how long the community can hold up.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullSurvivor

· 2025-12-29 19:24

Is it GameFi again? Is it really different this time? I'm skeptical. Wait, the destruction mechanism is linked to upgrades? That logic is okay, unlike those broken projects that run away from the start. Backed by Michael Wrubel? Then I need to take a look. The projects he has endorsed before are indeed pretty good. Pre-sale at $0.0012... Let's observe for now. After all, I've been through too many schemes to cut leeks. Strategic decision > repetitive operations. This idea is quite fresh. Finally, someone wants to break this dead loop of earning while playing. Limited issuance + destruction, a tactic to prevent collapse... It looks a bit thoughtful, but we need to see how it will be executed later.

View OriginalReply0

TokenDustCollector

· 2025-12-29 19:22

Another project claiming to solve the "play-to-earn" death spiral... Honestly, the management and strategy sound good on paper, but it all depends on how the actual operation turns out. Michael Wrubel's endorsement definitely adds credibility, but with such a low pre-sale price, caution is advised, as it could easily become a liquidity drain for big investors. The burn mechanism combined with token restrictions can theoretically support the token price, but the key is having enough genuine users to keep playing. PepeNode... The name still feels like it can't escape the meme fate. Whether players' mindset can truly shift from "quick cash-out" to "long-term optimization" is the real question. However, the mining system is somewhat interesting; it's more engaging than simple repetitive clicking.

View OriginalReply0

DefiEngineerJack

· 2025-12-29 19:11

honestly the tokenomics design here is *chef's kiss*... token cap + burn mechanism actually addresses the classic p&e death spiral, but ngl the devil's in the execution. wrubel's endorsement is cute but show me the formal verification or it's just vibes

Reply0