Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Celebrity Meme Coin Crash Warning: The Market Truth Behind the 80% Drop of Goddess Coin in 5 Hours
A $3.4 Million Fundraising Feast Ends in Disaster: Why Did It Go So Wrong?
In May 2025, Japanese entertainment star Uya Mikami launched the crypto project MIKAMI, which caused a sensation in the blockchain community. This wasn’t because the project had a bright future, but due to a jaw-dropping price crash: within just 5 hours of launch, the token’s value evaporated by 80%.
The story initially seemed dazzling—through a presale phase, MIKAMI raised $3.4 million from 17,560 participants. However, this massive fundraising did not bring market cheers; instead, it served as a brutal lesson on the risks of cryptocurrencies. Many presale investors paid an average of $0.245 per token and now face losses of up to 60%.
Why Did the MIKAMI Token Collapse So Quickly?
A deeper analysis of MIKAMI’s failure reveals several critical structural flaws:
Liquidity Trap: Only 15% Allocated to Market
MIKAMI’s tokenomics design is severely flawed. Only 15% of the total supply is allocated to liquidity pools—far below the industry standard of 20-25%. What does this mean? When large buyers or sellers enter the market, there isn’t enough buffer, causing price volatility to be amplified multiple times.
In contrast, 50% of tokens are locked under Uya Mikami’s name until 2069, 20% are allocated to presale investors, 10% for community building, and 5% for marketing. While this distribution appears to be a long-term plan, it actually sets the stage for short-term volatility bombs.
Celebrity Token’s Curse: Losing Appeal Means Nightmares
MIKAMI’s case is not unique. The celebrity-backed meme tokens in crypto have a horrifying failure record:
These cases demonstrate a brutal reality: once the novelty of a celebrity fades and early speculators cash out, such tokens often fall into a free fall.
Market Timing Disaster
MIKAMI launched during a generally weak period in the crypto market. Data shows that the meme coin market has declined by 56.8% since December 2024. In such an environment, launching a purely fan-culture token is undoubtedly sailing against the wind.
Ambitious Plans on Solana vs. Harsh Market Reality
MIKAMI is built on the Solana blockchain, which is a wise choice—offering sub-second transaction confirmation and fees below $0.01. The project is backed by Mikami Digital Collectibles LLC, which at least provides some legitimacy.
However, technical advantages and official backing cannot offset market realities. The project’s four-phase roadmap appears grand:
Yet, an 80% initial crash has cast a shadow over these bright visions. Community engagement is severely lacking, and investor confidence has already shattered.
The Practical Dilemma of Celebrity Tokens
MIKAMI attempts to provide real value to holders—exclusive merchandise rights, VIP event invitations, future DAO governance participation, and planned AI agent interactions. These ideas are attractive in theory, but face a core issue:
How many fans are willing to hold this asset to access these experiences now that the token has already plummeted 80% in value?
Exclusive merchandise and VIP events are usually correlated with the token’s ability to retain value. When investors face huge losses, their motivation to participate in the community evaporates.
Does MIKAMI Have an Edge Over Other Celebrity Coins?
The official team claims MIKAMI has three advantages over other celebrity-supported meme coins:
However, these advantages seem pale in the eyes of the market. Why? Because fundamental issues remain unresolved:
Data Speaks: The Cost to Presale Investors
Let’s look at concrete numbers to understand the impact of this crash:
This is not just a numerical decline; it’s a collapse of investor confidence.
Broader Market Warnings
The failure of MIKAMI serves as a wake-up call for the entire meme coin and celebrity token markets:
Current Market Performance and Outlook for MIKAMI Token
Since launch, MIKAMI’s price has remained low, far from recovering to presale levels. High volatility makes any attempt to buy the dip risky.
Can the team execute its ambitious four-phase roadmap? With community participation plummeting and investor confidence shattered, prospects look bleak. However, the 50-year lock-up period does suggest some long-term commitment from the official side—though it may also reflect disappointment with short-term market performance.
Key Tips for Investors
For those considering investing in celebrity-supported tokens or meme coins, MIKAMI offers important lessons:
1. Examine tokenomics carefully – 15% liquidity allocation is a red flag. Standard allocations should be 20-25% or higher.
2. Be cautious of celebrity endorsements – official support and detailed roadmaps do not guarantee market success. Practical utility and community engagement matter more.
3. Study market environment – launching new projects during a meme coin downturn is extremely risky.
4. Avoid chasing highs – rapid rises driven by celebrity hype are often the riskiest moments.
Conclusion
MIKAMI exemplifies a typical case in the 2025 crypto market—a project combining celebrity backing, technological innovation (Solana chain), comprehensive planning, and massive fundraising, yet experiencing a catastrophic crash within hours of launch. This story reminds us that in the crypto world, even when everything seems perfect, the market’s brutal reality will teach every participant a lesson.
For those monitoring MIKAMI’s development or considering similar investments, the key takeaway is: the true value of celebrity coins lies not in the number of fans of the founder, but in whether the project can establish real, sustainable use cases and community engagement. MIKAMI’s failure is a vivid testament to this principle.