Canada retail sales data show an interesting picture – for the month of November, sales increased by 1.2 percent compared to the previous month. This significantly exceeded expectations, as analysts had anticipated a 1.1 percent decline. Last month's data showed a 1.0 percent decrease.



But there is another detail that draws attention – excluding the oil sector from the retail sales. Here we see a decline of 1.8 percent. Expectations were positive: a 0.1 percent increase. The previous period's figure was also a 0.1 percent increase.

What's going on here? The growth in manufacturing sales looks good at a superficial glance, but the decline in oil-excluded sales indicates that start-up sales are carrying the overall better result. This raises questions about future dynamism.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HashRateHermitvip
· 3h ago
The data supporting oil prices is a bit concerning in reality.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 3h ago
Oil prices have risen, and without oil, it drops. Canada's data seems a bit fake...
View OriginalReply0
WalletsWatchervip
· 3h ago
Oil rescue, remove the oil price and it drops directly. This data is a bit hard to hold up.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationAlertvip
· 4h ago
Wait, is oil and gas data so strong? Removing oil sales, it directly drops by 1.8%. Doesn't that mean the entire growth is supported by energy?
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearchervip
· 4h ago
The data doesn't look right, brother. The apparent growth is all supported by oil... According to the logic in the white paper, this is a typical signal of economic structural imbalance, and the incentive mechanism needs to be re-evaluated. Fake growth caused by fluctuations in energy prices, the real demand is actually shrinking... This is a dead signal in macro models. The surface data looks good but the core logic has collapsed. It feels like "political data beautification" before governance proposals are approved—illusory prosperity. Key indicators drop sharply after excluding energy, indicating that the market fundamentals simply can't support the growth narrative.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)