Why did they go for equity instead of litigation funding? Simple answer: they're past the early stage.

When you tap non-recourse funders, they'll squeeze you hard. We're talking brutal economics plus operational control—that's just how it works. The math doesn't favor borrowers.

Cassius looked at the numbers and realized equity made more sense. Here's why: litigation funding typically means watching 30–50% of your award evaporate before you see it. That's a massive leak. By structuring equity deals, they dodged that percentage drain and kept their burn rate lean. Control over your own destiny matters too.

It's the classic play when you've got runway and a clear path ahead—you don't hand over half your upside just to fund the fight. You keep it tight, keep it yours.