We are now facing a rather ironic situation. Humanity has developed telescopes capable of observing galaxies, detectors that can capture particle collisions, and devices that can scan brainwaves... but all the data collected by these sophisticated instruments ultimately become isolated islands. Weather satellite data and social media sentiment are completely out of sync, power grid sensors can't interpret pandemic curves, and various digital sensors are like severed nerve endings, each acting independently.



Why is this happening? Essentially, we have been using a centralized approach—dumpting all data into a single repository and waiting for humans to sift through and analyze it. It's like each muscle in the body sending signals separately to different brain regions, never able to coordinate in real-time. The result? No matter how much data there is, it remains dead data.

The Walrus Protocol, combined with Sui to form the "programmable data object" model, seems to be trying a different path. It doesn't aim to build a one-size-fits-all brain, but instead designs a protocol that allows each data source—whether it's a street corner sensor or a space telescope—to package its data stream into "neural cells" with autonomous behavior and a unified interface. These cells interact and self-organize within a decentralized network, ultimately emerging with holistic perception and predictive capabilities. This is what data infrastructure should look like.
SUI-2.84%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
wagmi_eventuallyvip
· 2h ago
Dead data accumulated into isolated islands, this problem really needs a solution. --- Centralized thinking is like nested dolls; in the end, all the data is just for show. --- Walrus's neural cell model sounds pretty sexy, but I wonder how it will actually perform once implemented. --- Basically, the infrastructure is too garbage, with departments working independently. --- This idea is correct—decentralized data autonomous coordination—but the implementation difficulty is beyond most people's imagination. --- Feels like just making a pie in the sky; let's wait until there are real application scenarios. --- Programmable data objects? Sounds promising, but not sure if true intelligence can emerge. --- The data silo problem has never been solved; can it work this time? A bit of hype. --- Sui ecosystem is again doing concept marketing, but this time the logic does actually make sense. --- Decentralized self-organizing data networks, the ideal is great, but the reality is different.
View OriginalReply0
probably_nothing_anonvip
· 2h ago
The problem of data silos is indeed unbearable; the idea of decentralized neural networks still has some potential.
View OriginalReply0
BasementAlchemistvip
· 3h ago
It sounds pretty ideal, but in reality, will the big giants let go, haha. --- The centralized data warehouse approach is definitely a dead end, but can Sui truly coordinate neural cells? --- Wow, that analogy is excellent. Right now, we are just a bunch of autistic sensors. --- Decentralization sounds great, but the key question is: who will be responsible for this "emergence"? --- We've been talking about the data silo problem for so many years. Is Walrus truly innovative or just another wheel? --- I just want to know how much money this protocol will burn when it runs and how reliable it is. --- The analogy of neural cells is well used, but can Web3 people turn biological metaphors into reality? Or is it just bragging.
View OriginalReply0
OptionWhisperervip
· 3h ago
This neural cell setup looks good, but who will ensure data quality once it’s truly implemented? Decentralization sounds great, but the problem is garbage in, garbage out, brother. Finally, someone has explained the data silo problem thoroughly; centralization is a dead end. The Sui ecosystem’s move is quite impressive, but I think we need to wait and see how it performs in actual applications. The analogy of a neural network for data is brilliant; finally, it’s not that old-fashioned centralized thinking. Could it be just a new bottle with old wine? In the end, we might still have to rely on humans to validate. I like Walrus’s logic; it’s much smarter than those schemes that insist on building a central hub. It sounds good, but the key is whether the interaction costs will explode. Autonomous data sources? Sounds like AI is about to awaken, haha. Now the data can really come alive, no longer just dead bodies lying in the database.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)