Look at $BREV, and the most straightforward feeling is—boring. The entire market is filled with typical graduation pump characteristics.

Long-term unilateral movement is the norm. It’s either slow decline or sudden dump, with almost no room for bilateral trading. Occasionally, there’s a rally, but it’s impossible to tell if it’s driven by genuine market demand; it seems more like an attempt to create liquidity for selling. Lack of turnover, lack of relay, and no signs of emotional recovery—this alone is enough to explain everything. Long-term planning? There’s none at all.

What’s even more disappointing is the trace of quantification. Wash trading, spoofing, rhythm control, stop-loss sweeping—all done with eerily precise timing. It doesn’t resemble a real market at all; it looks more like algorithmic results directly pulled from a lab. Retail investors are locked into the algorithm’s grip from the moment they enter, with oscillations testing patience, triggering high-leverage positions, and combined with the continuous negative erosion of funding rates—high-leverage players are slowly drained dry. On the surface, you’re trading, but in reality, you’re caught in a carefully designed harvesting process.

The project team’s performance is equally disappointing. No substantial delivery, no clear progress, but they love to create hype at critical moments, manipulating the market to generate illusions. They stay silent during rises, disappear completely during falls, and only have tricks up their sleeves in unilateral trends—there’s no sign of genuine intent to build a serious project.

In the end, this isn’t a project at all, but a process; not a trend, but a carefully crafted harvesting scheme. Once you see through it, walk away decisively.