2026-01-15 14:37:25

It's wild how tweaking the algorithm can totally revive your feed—but here's the thing: if your engagement numbers are still tanking, the real issue might be staring back at you in the mirror. Sometimes it's not the platform. It's what you're actually putting out there. Quality content wins. Always.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnchainDetective

· 7h ago

According to on-chain data, this explanation is a bit superficial... The real issue is actually hidden inside the algorithm's black box, and I guessed it a long time ago. On the surface, it claims to be a "quality content winner," but behind the scenes, it's the fund flow patterns of those big V accounts that are at play. Through multi-address tracking, you'll find that accounts with a sharp drop in engagement often exhibit suspicious wallet behavior. This is no coincidence.

View OriginalReply0

failed_dev_successful_ape

· 7h ago

To be honest, the algorithms have long been overly hyped... The real ones dragging things down are those self-deceiving content creators who insist on blaming the platform.

View OriginalReply0

NotGonnaMakeIt

· 8h ago

Basically, no matter how the algorithm is adjusted, it can't save poor content. I have deep personal experience with this.

View OriginalReply0