The bull market is passionate but short-lived, and the bear market comes quickly. Many projects attract attention during the hype, but once the heat fades, users and ecosystems often shrink significantly. Walrus has taken a different approach—it hasn't passively chased the trend but has considered how to survive market changes from the design stage.



The project's adaptability is reflected in the flexibility of its ecosystem. $WAL 's economic model is not rigid but leaves room for adjustments. Cross-chain projects, ecosystem sub-projects, and new gameplay integrations can be quickly promoted without lengthy approval processes. This means that when new opportunities arise in the market, the ecosystem can respond immediately, and users can participate at the first moment. Many projects cannot do this, which is also an advantage for Walrus in the competition.

From the token perspective, $WAL will not be abandoned due to short-term market fluctuations. The scalability of the ecosystem design ensures that the token can always find new application scenarios—whether it's stable yield strategies or opportunities brought by new sub-projects. Users have multiple ways to participate and are not bound by a single narrative.

Another key point is the project's focus on long-term potential. By continuously expanding the ecosystem, introducing partners, and attracting new users, Walrus has built a deeper moat in the market. This is not short-term hype marketing but the creation of a resilient system that allows projects and users to find value across different market cycles.
WAL-3.14%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DaoResearchervip
· 4h ago
According to the Tokenomics design in Chapter 2.3 of the white paper, the flexibility of $WAL indeed reflects the principle of incentive compatibility. It is worth noting that the real effectiveness of this scalable architecture in a highly volatile market environment still requires on-chain data validation. However, to put it another way, can the execution speed of governance proposals truly keep up with market windows? That is the real test. Flexibility ≠ Effectiveness. What about specific data? That's a good point, but the logical chain for building a moat is somewhat loose. It is recommended to add benchmark data against competitors. From the perspective of DAO governance, multi-path participation design indeed reduces the risk of single points of failure, aligning with Vitalik's discussion on decentralization stability. It seems like this is about project resilience, but what quantifiable indicators demonstrate resilience? Lacking supporting data. The bull and bear cycle argument is not sufficiently convincing; historical data is needed to speak for itself.
View OriginalReply0
Rugman_Walkingvip
· 4h ago
Sounds good, but the key is whether it can really be executed properly.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a606bf0cvip
· 4h ago
Sounds good, but who isn't hyping it up like this now... The key still depends on whether it can hold up in the end.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)