Some project tweets are indeed poorly written. It's immediately obvious that they are AI-generated content, which feels very stiff and directly lowers the quality of the information flow.

What’s even more frustrating is that these years, KOLs have been thriving on their information advantage. How do they manage to get thousands or even tens of thousands of U.S. dollars from airdrops of new projects? Is it just because they have many followers and can set the tone? For ordinary users, this is really unfair.

Now many exchanges have launched participation mechanisms with lower entry barriers to encourage retail investors to join directly. I strongly agree with this approach — whoever wins the retail market wins the world. Instead of letting a few people monopolize opportunities, it’s better to let every participant earn rewards based on their contribution. Only then can the ecosystem truly come alive, and it will be easier to attract newcomers.