2026-01-15 19:59:51

The Solana ecosystem welcomes an important policy adjustment. The core advisor of SOL and head of the X platform announced that, considering the recent proliferation of spam content generated by some AI applications and frequent scams, API access permissions will be tightened. This means that the related application ecosystem may face a reshuffle. The move aims to improve the content quality and user experience of the SOL ecosystem and prevent malicious applications from abusing platform resources. Industry insiders believe that this decision reflects the maturing governance of Web3 applications, with the ecosystem beginning to focus on user protection and platform health. For developers committed to creating high-quality applications, this is also an opportunity to further enhance technology and service standards.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidationTherapist

· 1h ago

It should have been regulated long ago. Those trash AI scammers are really outrageous. --- Tightening permissions? To put it nicely, it's governance; to put it bluntly, it's still centralization. --- Opportunities for quality applications? Probably just giving benefits to top projects. --- This decision is too unfriendly to small developers, and the threshold will be raised again. --- Finally taking action. Users who have been scammed are too miserable. --- But can it really be controlled? How to verify the quality of applications? --- What’s there to talk about Web3 being mature? It’s just about regulating when needed. --- Good news, the ecosystem needs to self-clean; otherwise, it’s more vulnerable to attacks. --- Sounds good, but execution is the key. --- This wave is a form of de facto power concentration, which is a bit ironic.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityNinja

· 3h ago

It should have been like this a long time ago. There are too many trash AI scammers, and a shake-up is inevitable. In fact, this is a good thing for developers who are serious about their projects.

View OriginalReply0

ResearchChadButBroke

· 7h ago

It was about time to regulate this. Trash AI bots are everywhere, it's really annoying. But with this round of tightening permissions, will even good projects be affected...

View OriginalReply0

LuckyBlindCat

· 7h ago

Finally, someone is taking action against these trash AI applications. Being bombarded with scam messages every day is so annoying. Tightening permissions is a good idea; it's time for a cleanup. Only those who truly have substance will remain. Honestly, SOL's recent moves show they understand governance better than some ecosystems. The real builders can finally breathe a sigh of relief. Those small trash projects relying on hype should just roll out. By the way, now that developers want to enter the application space, the barriers are indeed higher, and competition is even fiercer. But that's actually a good thing. At least the user experience can improve, unlike some places where everything is a mess.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropF5Bro

· 7h ago

It should have been done like this a long time ago. Those AI garbage kings should have been dealt with long ago. Solana is finally getting serious.

View OriginalReply0

FarmHopper

· 7h ago

It's about time to regulate this. These trash AI applications are really annoying to death. It's called improving the ecosystem, but honestly, it's just reshuffling and淘汰. Genuine projects are not afraid of tightening permissions at all. This round of adjustments is actually good for us ordinary users, better than being scammed.

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 7h ago

It's about time to crack down; those trash AI scammers are really going too far. Tightening API permissions is the right move, but who will be cleaned out this time? Talking about improving quality, but it's really about淘汰掉那些混子. Waiting to see what happens next; it feels like the Solana ecosystem is about to undergo a major reshuffle. Developers who are genuinely working shouldn't have any issues, right? Could this actually be a good thing for them?

View OriginalReply0