We're testing two distinct approaches this round:



Vision Mode leverages chart imagery with single allocation execution and maintains rolling memory throughout positions.

Chart Reader Mode takes a different angle—it manages lot-based positions with explicit take-profit and stop-loss levels, plus conducts thorough invalidation reviews to validate trade setups.

Each brings something different to the table. Vision relies on visual pattern recognition and continuous tracking, while Chart Reader emphasizes structured risk management with clear exit criteria and systematic review protocols.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GmGnSleepervip
· 5h ago
Vision mode sounds more aggressive, but the Chart Reader system's risk control is indeed more stable... However, can it really be consistently implemented in practice?
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmivip
· 5h ago
Visual mode still sounds like picture-based communication; chart reading is the real risk control.
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTopvip
· 5h ago
Vision mode sounds pretty good, but I'm worried that continuous scrolling tracking might keep stacking all the way to the bottom.
View OriginalReply0
ContractFreelancervip
· 5h ago
Looking at the two strategies, vision mode and chart reader, it still seems that chart reader is more reliable, at least because it has a clear stop-loss point.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)