2026-01-15 20:26:39

Interesting experiment, but it lost the plot somewhere along the way. These types of projects tend to be highly adaptive to market demands—they'll pivot whatever direction attracts attention. The concept had potential, though execution-wise things got messy pretty fast.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

5 Likes

Reward
5
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HypotheticalLiquidator

· 5h ago

The health factor has been falling below 0.8 all the way. These types of projects should have started deleveraging procedures long ago. No matter how good the concept is, it can't withstand an execution collapse. Currently, this situation is a typical precursor to a domino effect.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 5h ago

That's right, these kinds of projects just go with the flow, leaning towards where the hype is.

View OriginalReply0

ValidatorViking

· 5h ago

pivot culture is exactly what kills protocol integrity tbh. watched too many "promising" initiatives tank because they chased shiny objects instead of maintaining consensus finality. execution matters way more than theoretical potential—that's just battle-tested truth

Reply0

fren.eth

· 5h ago

Nah, I've seen this trick so many times before. The concept sounds great, but the execution is full of pitfalls. In the end, it's just following the trend to change direction and attract attention.

View OriginalReply0

SelfStaking

· 5h ago

NGL, this is a typical case of a good concept dying in execution. It looks just like some crypto project—change direction whenever the wind blows.

View OriginalReply0