2026-01-15 20:49:39

The SUGP project architecture design shares a similar token economic model and governance structure with SPHL and ANPA. These three projects exhibit a high degree of consistency at the foundational framework level, all revolving around similar incentive mechanisms and ecological layouts. Notably, this structural similarity may reflect the current project's reliance on validated design schemes and provides investors with a reference dimension for cross-project benchmarking.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CommunityWorker

· 3h ago

Copy and paste templates, is this how it's done these days?

View OriginalReply0

ContractHunter

· 3h ago

Is it another copy-paste template, with the SUGP, SPHL, and ANPA brothers all wearing the same pants?

View OriginalReply0

NFTArtisanHQ

· 3h ago

ngl, three projects with the same tokenomics blueprint feels less like innovation and more like... copy-paste aesthetics. where's the creative provenance here? 🤔

Reply0

DefiPlaybook

· 3h ago

It's another copy-paste architecture, but on the other hand, a validated solution is a good solution to avoid pitfalls [Dog Head] --- Three projects share the same template; it depends on code quality and execution capability. No matter how beautiful the framework is, if TVL drops to zero, it's all pointless. --- Cross-project benchmarking research? I just want to ask, how are these two brother projects doing? Does SUGP have reasons to surpass them? --- Borrowed ideas are just that—borrowed. The key still depends on which team doesn't run away and whose gas fees don't cut into the users' gains. --- High consistency = high risk similarity. To earn easy money, it depends on whose APY is real and whose is just data manipulation. --- I've seen too many of these "validated solutions," and in the end, it's just the same old tricks with a different name. --- Honestly, having three projects with the same architecture isn't a bad thing, but with such severe homogenization, how can liquidity be divided?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropAnxiety

· 3h ago

Hmm, it's the same template again? SUGP, SPHL, ANPA all feel the same.

View OriginalReply0