2026-01-15 21:28:13

In the physical AI and robotics ecosystem, the true measure of sustainability is the stability of the revenue model.

Narratives will constantly change, but revenue figures do not lie. To truly operationalize robotics infrastructure, practical application scenarios need to be implemented. Users pay for real utility, not driven solely by incentive mechanisms. These are two different things.

How long the network can survive, how quickly it can progress, and whether long-term decentralization can be achieved depend on whether revenue growth is sustained. Without a stable source of income, even the best vision is just a castle in the air. Only when users are willing to pay continuously can the ecosystem sustain itself, iterate constantly, and ultimately achieve a truly decentralized ecosystem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StrawberryIce

· 4h ago

That’s right, these days there are too many projects just blowing air; few can really make money. --- Exactly, but do you know how difficult it is to actually implement? The incentive mechanisms are far from real-world use cases. --- So why do most robot projects still fail at the revenue model stage? --- I agree, no matter how good the narrative is, if users don’t pay, it’s all nonsense. Robotics is the area that tests this the most. --- Wait, can they really keep users paying continuously? I have some doubts about that. --- Whether the income is stable or not directly determines how long the project can survive. It’s not something虚的 (虚的 means "虚" here, implying "虚假" or "fake"). --- For physical AI to truly take off, there must be solid applications. Just burning money won’t cut it.

View OriginalReply0

gas_guzzler

· 4h ago

Basically, if you don't have money, don't brag. We're tired of this routine. The income figures are the real truth; everything else is just a story. The hype built by incentive mechanisms is completely different from actual user payments. You need to recognize this. There's no talk of decentralization without stable cash flow; in the end, it's all just a bubble. True sustainability is this simple and straightforward: users must be willing to spend money.

View OriginalReply0

SleepyArbCat

· 4h ago

Hearing you say that, I need to wake up for a second... When it comes to real-world application scenarios, this is indeed hard currency. The incentive mining approach has long been slapped in the face.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-bd883c58

· 4h ago

That's right, telling stories alone won't cut it; the revenue data speaks for itself. Many projects fail right here...

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainDecoder

· 4h ago

Research shows that this touches on a seriously underestimated issue—distinguishing between incentive mechanisms and actual demand. It is worth noting that most failed on-chain ecosystems die precisely at this gap. Data indicates that daily active users supported by token incentives often decline by over 80% after subsidies are cut, and this is no coincidence. From a technical architecture perspective, the sustainability of robot infrastructure is essentially an economic issue rather than a purely engineering one. The true revenue sources need to meet several hard metrics: 1) unit economics must be closed 2) user acquisition costs must be controllable 3) retention rate must exceed the cold start period. All are indispensable. So, stop hyping grand visions. Just open the books and take a look.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter007

· 4h ago

You're right, no matter how fancy the storytelling, it can't hide the lack of real revenue. Income is the true litmus test; many projects die the moment incentives dry up. Things that users are willing to pay for are the ones with vitality; everything else is just bubbles. Real application implementation is true skill; who can't draw a pie in the sky? How many projects are still relying on fundraising to survive? Wake up, everyone. Decentralization that can't generate revenue is a joke, stop it. That's why I only look at revenue performance; other nonsense can be put aside for now. Without a continuous paying user base, any ecosystem is just paper-thin, trust me. Every day hearing new narratives, but it's better to see if people actually have money in their wallets. The core is simple: is there anyone willing to truly pay? That's all.

View OriginalReply0