2026-01-15 21:37:37

As the popularity of certain projects gradually wanes, it's time to refocus on truly promising tracks. What attracts me to Anichess is its combination of traditional board games with blockchain gaming. As a chess player, I am very optimistic about this direction; meanwhile, Cysic's tech stack and development vision represent the future direction of blockchain infrastructure.

Rather than just watching from the sidelines, it's better to take action. Builders, what will be your next focus: continue to deepen your projects or explore across multiple tracks? Share your plans.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

JustAnotherWallet

· 3h ago

The integration of chess and gaming sounds promising, but could it just be another fleeting hype? Cysic indeed has potential; the infrastructure is where the long-term value lies. But it still depends on the team's execution; a good vision alone isn't enough.

View OriginalReply0

GoldDiggerDuck

· 3h ago

The board game blockchain games track is indeed interesting, but can Anichess really break through the circle? It seems to depend on user retention.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinAnxiety

· 3h ago

I have also been paying attention to the chain gaming in board games, but honestly, how is Anichess's user retention data? Can anyone tell the truth? I've heard Cysic a few times, but it still feels like it doesn't quite match the popularity of those mainstream infrastructure projects. Can it really represent the future? Instead of obsessing over the choice of track, it's better to ask yourself whether you can withstand the next bear market. Don't just shout about action; you need to see if anyone has really made money from these projects. Deep cultivation and exploration are essentially about who runs away first, haha. Anichess + Cysic combo? Sounds like they're trying to give more doses of a special medicine to anxiety sufferers.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropLicker

· 3h ago

Board game blockchain games indeed have imagination, but whether Anichess can deliver truly fun experiences depends on future iterations... Cysic is somewhat interesting; infrastructure has long needed serious development. Diving deep or exploring multiple chains is a difficult question to ask... Instead of choosing one or the other, I prefer to master one first and not spread myself too thin by trying to do everything at once.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-e19e9c10

· 4h ago

The idea of a chess chain game is indeed innovative, but can Anichess really stand out? It feels like the competition is quite fierce. But to be fair, the infrastructure track does have long-term value, and it's much more reliable than those superficial concepts. Deep cultivation or exploration, it depends on the amount of funding and risk tolerance. I prefer to find one or two projects I really believe in and go all in. How is Cysic's tech stack? Can you elaborate? Just looking at the vision isn't convincing enough. Instead of asking others about their plans, it's better to do thorough research yourself. This cycle is filled with too much information noise. This question is like asking "to all-in or diversify," and obviously there's no standard answer... It all depends on your skills.

View OriginalReply0

nft_widow

· 4h ago

I also pay attention to the board game chain games, but can Anichess really differentiate itself... It feels like this direction is easy to get messed up. I'm optimistic about the Cysic infrastructure set, but it all depends on who can survive in the end. Let those who should be eliminated this round go bankrupt quickly, don't occupy the heat. Deep cultivation or multi-line exploration... it depends on how many bullets you still have in your pocket haha. Honestly, there are too many tracks right now, and focus is actually a scarce commodity. Combining board games and infrastructure... there's some imagination space, but don't expect too much. Builders truly lack that know-how, not just enthusiasm. Exploring multiple tracks is too risky; it's better to master one thoroughly. I feel like Anichess is an interesting experiment, but the question is whether it has enough explosive power. In infrastructure, slow work yields fine results, don't rush. The dilemma for builders... focus or expand, an eternal paradox.

View OriginalReply0