A certain public chain's developer incentive program is truly attractive—the reward pool of 750,000 tokens directly lowers the entry barrier. The core logic of this approach is quite clear: exchange real money for ecosystem activity, giving more creative ideas a chance to be realized.



In simple terms, this is a signal—technology is no longer the exclusive domain of a few large companies; ordinary developers can also participate in building. As long as you have ideas and are willing to get hands-on, whether it's small games, tools, or applications, as long as it can run and people use it, there's a chance to receive support.

Other public chain projects can also learn from this approach. Instead of worrying about whether the code is AI-generated, it's better to focus on whether the application itself solves a problem and is truly usable. The prerequisite for a thriving ecosystem is lowering participation barriers, allowing more creators to have opportunities for trial and error. From this perspective, such incentive programs are actually accelerating the iteration cycle of the entire ecosystem—quality varies? That's okay; the market will automatically filter.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoSourGrapevip
· 5h ago
If I had known about this plan earlier, I would have joined long ago. I just heard about it now? I'm really kicking myself for not knowing sooner.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_vibingvip
· 6h ago
750,000 tokens invested—that's the real gameplay. Putting real money into the ecosystem is far more meaningful than just bragging.
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivorvip
· 6h ago
750,000 tokens? That sounds like another old trick of a Ponzi scheme rebranding itself. I've seen too many of these in 2018. Projects that can truly survive don't need to go all out and dump coins like this. Wait, let's see if a truly innovative application materializes. Right now, it's all just garbage coin games.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinConnoisseurvip
· 6h ago
750,000 tokens, what can they buy? Just wait and see. As long as it works, no need to be picky. This round indeed lowered the threshold, but it depends on which projects remain active in the end. Honestly, it's much more reliable than just burning money on marketing. Market screening? Haha, find gold in the pile. The chosen ones should get excited now.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropAgainvip
· 6h ago
750,000 tokens are really not a lot, but the key is how to distribute them.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonkvip
· 6h ago
With 750,000 tokens thrown in, this move is indeed aggressive. But to be honest, it's just a gamble on whether the ecosystem can survive. Another "lowering the threshold" story, I've heard too many. Only a few can truly survive. Can token incentives bring about ecosystem prosperity? I think it's most likely just another way to cut leeks. It's called "market filtering" in a nice way, but in reality, it's just a flood of garbage applications entering and then collectively dying. Ordinary developers participate in building, provided these tokens are truly valuable. In my opinion, it mainly depends on funding and background. I've learned a lot from this wave of operations. When everyone plays this way, there's no longer any differentiation in competition. It's heating up, and the size of the incentive pool has become the new arms race. Can anyone really make money from this? Or is it just another story of a young dragon slayer becoming a dragon?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)