2026-01-16 08:38:22

Supporting innovative projects like this—designing incentive mechanisms to reward creators is indeed the right direction. However, the key lies in the execution details. If a portion of the reward funds exceeding 500,000 can be allocated to the project's development itself, or at least the specific use of these funds can be disclosed to the community, it would greatly help to enhance community trust. Transparency is often a crucial factor in determining the long-term vitality of a project.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainWatcher

· 5h ago

That's so true, transparency is really a matter of life and death. Investing 500,000 must be explained clearly; otherwise, even the best mechanism is useless.

View OriginalReply0

NoStopLossNut

· 5h ago

Transparency is indeed a pain point. With 500,000 invested, where exactly did it go? It's unclear. Hopefully, it won't turn into the old script of "community trust" again.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwich

· 5h ago

Well said, but I'm afraid it's just empty talk again. Putting 500,000 into an incentive mechanism—real money, real rewards? I've seen too many opaque projects, and they all end up failing in the end.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHustler