When industry insiders talk about privacy chains, they often mention technical terms like TPS and zero-knowledge proofs. But frankly, I am more interested in how the underlying execution model is designed.

Dusk's strength lies in — from the very beginning, it integrates privacy assets and contract execution considerations, rather than patching them on afterward. In other words, privacy, contract logic, and verification mechanisms are not separate; they are tightly coupled from the design phase.

This integrated approach may sound unremarkable, but when you actually build complex financial applications, the difference becomes clear. Solutions that add a privacy layer later on often end up with compatibility issues and performance losses.

So when evaluating projects, there's no need to focus solely on a single feature. The key is whether it can support more complex, regulation-compliant financial structures. From this perspective, architecture design is the true dividing line in competition.