2026-01-16 10:21:49

The market finally shows signs of improvement. But the problem is also in front of us—the application ecosystem on SOL, as a public chain, has recently taken off very quickly, with users and funds continuously flowing in that direction. In comparison, the vitality on the BSC chain has noticeably declined.

This is not purely a technical issue; ultimately, it comes down to the attractiveness of the ecosystem applications. When DeFi projects, NFT applications, and GameFi on a chain are more innovative and active, users will naturally be attracted there. The user base and developer resources accumulated on BSC should not be wasted in vain.

Some veteran users are calling loudly—hoping to see trading platforms increase investment in the BSC ecosystem, launching more targeted products and incentives. Whether it’s contract tools, liquidity mining, or ecosystem support, now is the time to seize the initiative. If no action is taken, more users and funds siphoned from the SOL chain will continue to grow.

Ecosystem competition has always been a dynamic process. Today's leader may not maintain tomorrow's advantage; it all depends on who responds faster to market demands and who maintains ecosystem vitality with greater dedication. BSC still has a chance to turn things around; it all depends on how it is seized.

SOL-0.88%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DancingCandles

· 4h ago

BSC is now just a retirement home. I should have hoarded more SOL if I had known earlier.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSunriser

· 4h ago

BSC this time is a bit disappointing, and SOL is indeed recruiting people. It seems that the big players have all moved over there.

View OriginalReply0

hodl_therapist

· 4h ago

BSC is indeed a bit disappointing here, while SOL claims that its technology is lacking, the ecosystem has actually taken off. I should have gone all in on SOL earlier. But BSC shouldn't just lie flat either; there’s still a chance to turn things around. It feels like the platform should make a move, or it will really become a second-tier public chain. Losing users is easier to talk about than to solve; it requires real financial incentives. The SOL ecosystem is indeed more vibrant, with various new applications emerging constantly. BSC has too many old projects, but none of them are innovative anymore. It feels like a player update cycle—users always flock to the hottest spots. I hope exchanges stop slacking off; if they need to invest, just do it. The key is to have a blockbuster application—just one is enough, everything else is easier to handle.

View OriginalReply0

quietly_staking

· 4h ago

BSC is the result of being exploited for quick gains, it was long overdue for reflection. SOL is indeed seriously developing its ecosystem, while BSC is still relying on its old reputation. Honestly, the problem is that the response is too slow; just wait, the reaction will become even more sluggish. The biggest danger in ecosystem competition is just lying back and counting money, and BSC is in that state now. It feels like it's already beyond recovery; the money has all moved to SOL.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 4h ago

Come on, SOL is just a traffic password, there are plenty of black swans. Isn't it better for us to steadily build on BSC? How can BSC be no good? The ecosystem foundation is still there, it's just that market attention has been diverted. I really don't get it. Talking about a turnaround, we should have gone all in earlier. Is it too late now to talk about it? Let SOL take off if it wants to, anyway my assets are still on BSC. Let the bullets fly for a while. The attractiveness of an ecosystem, honestly, depends on whether they can hype up concepts. BSC should learn from SOL's marketing strategies.

View OriginalReply0