The fierce opposition from a leading platform to the CLARITY proposal ultimately boils down to a matter of interests. Digging deeper, their main concern is focused on stablecoin yields. Last year's key legislation introduced an interesting provision—prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying interest to holders, but allowing "third parties and affiliates" to provide yields. This detail has become a loophole for some platforms to operate. In other words, they use related-party mechanisms to indirectly earn from the stablecoin ecosystem, circumventing the restrictions imposed on issuers by the legislation. The gap left by the policy is precisely what they aim to protect.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlindBoxVictimvip
· 4h ago
Hmm, this is just the usual capital trick. The surface appearance looks quite convincing, but in reality, it's just a different disguise to continue exploiting users.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLabvip
· 4h ago
Haha, this gap was dug beautifully. Even Luban No.7 has to applaud. As soon as the regulators open their mouths, they leave a "related party" backdoor for them. Now they're well-versed.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420vip
· 4h ago
It's all about money; essentially, it's about protecting that gray area.
View OriginalReply0
DataBartendervip
· 4h ago
Tsk, it's the same old trick again, hiding behind the guise of compliance while actually finding loopholes.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)