Exchanges are increasingly crossing over into TradFi, and Gate has joined in. Stocks, gold, forex, and index CFDs are all launched at once. This move may seem ordinary, but in fact, the timing is quite strategic.



The products themselves lack much innovation, relying on tired routines. But here’s the question: the crypto market has been stagnant recently, on-chain yields are highly competitive, and users are starting to desperately look for new avenues. "Should I try traditional finance?" this idea is becoming more and more common in the community.

Exchanges have seized this opportunity. Since there is demand from users, why not leverage their own scale and user base to do this? A few details are worth noting: KYC is completed in one go, avoiding repeated hassle, and the entry barrier is lowered directly. It’s truly convenient for users—existing accounts can be activated instantly, with seamless switching between different asset classes. This is what really wins users’ hearts.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
YieldChaservip
· 4h ago
Market performance is poor, but this trick is indeed brilliant—one account handles everything. --- Basically copying traditional methods, but the timing is spot on. --- I give full marks for the convenience of KYC; no need for repeated verification, which is indeed great. --- It's both a trick and a scam; this exchange is just trying to scam money. --- Users who can't make money naturally want to try others; this exchange is just enabling margin lending. --- Seamless switching sounds good, but I'm worried slippage might be worse than TradFi. --- Playing by the rules with exchanges always feels a bit off. --- Wait, isn't this just making it harder for users to withdraw their funds? --- Lowering the threshold actually makes it easier to harvest users' funds. --- Account integration is worth it, saving the hassle of back-and-forth.
View OriginalReply0
SocialFiQueenvip
· 4h ago
Really? This move is indeed clever. Users are almost driven crazy by on-chain earnings. Now there's a seamless switch option—who can resist?
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybookvip
· 4h ago
According to on-chain data, approximately 42% of active users on major exchanges are seeking asset diversification exits. This wave of cross-border TradFi operations indeed hits a pain point. However, it is worth noting that from three dimensions—user stickiness, compliance costs, and risk control mechanisms—the entire logical chain still has obvious vulnerabilities. A single KYC only solves superficial problems; the real risk lies in whether the volatility of traditional finance can align with the risk preferences of crypto users. It is recommended to observe the 7-day retention rate of new users for such products, as the true retention rate for these cross-border strategies typically does not exceed 28%.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptcyArtistvip
· 4h ago
When the market is stagnant, should we just run away? I think we should wait and see. This wave of crossing over feels like the exchange is just cutting leeks, changing the tricks. Are you really willing to touch everything? Completing KYC once sounds comfortable, but who will take responsibility for the risks? I'm tired of this routine already. I just want to see if I can squeeze another wave of blood from traditional finance. Lowering the threshold is actually a bad thing. If the rabble rushes in, won't everyone just lose everything? Wait a minute, everyone. Who really uses this to trade stocks and gold? Honestly. No, no, I’d rather buy bottom coins. It’s still better than playing those虚的. Watching a good show, waiting for this wave to crash.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFatiguevip
· 4h ago
Haha, it's that "one-click asset switching" story again, and I'm already tired of hearing it. But I have to say, this wave of timing is indeed very tricky to grasp. Wait, getting KYC done once... is it really a hassle-free solution? I feel like it's just packing user data even deeper. In the crypto world, when there's no profit, people just think about trading stocks or gold. The exchanges are laughing to death, and yet another wave of new investors. Product innovation may be lacking, but the low threshold tactic is indeed ruthless. Anyway, I'm tempted, might as well give it a try. It's called "seamless switching" in nice words, but in reality, it's just locking you into one platform. Thinking about it still feels a bit uncomfortable.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiNotNakamotovip
· 4h ago
Basically, the exchange is exploiting users. When users stop making profits, they just push them into traditional finance. --- This trick is really boring. It’s just trapping users in one ecosystem and not letting them escape. --- Doing KYC once is really comfortable; otherwise, it’s a headache. --- Still can't see where the profit is. Feels like internal circle fighting among each other. --- When crypto market is bad, they rush to TradFi? The exchange’s tactics are pretty ruthless. --- Lowering the threshold sounds good, but actually they just want to sell us more crappy products. --- Seamless switching sounds good, but in reality, it’s just the exchange extracting liquidity. --- The market is most vulnerable to being exploited when it’s stagnant. Better to be cautious. --- Ugh, it’s that same “thinking of users” excuse again. So annoying.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)