2026-01-18 07:30:57

A 40-year supply schedule with 35% annual deflation—sounds intriguing on paper. But where's the proof it's actually working? The numbers need to add up. Without concrete on-chain data showing this mechanism's real impact on market dynamics, it's just theory. Anyone making bold tokenomic claims should back them up with actual metrics, not assumptions. That's how you separate serious projects from hype.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ThesisInvestor

· 4h ago

Looks good on paper, but what about on-chain data? The real data speaks for itself.

View OriginalReply0

SolidityStruggler

· 4h ago

35% annualized deflation? Anyone can boast about the on-paper data, but how many are truly implemented on the chain?

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiChallenger

· 4h ago

40-year supply plan, 35% annual deflation... Ironically, these kinds of numbers are the easiest to deceive people. Data shows that the project previously hyped had a liquidation rate close to 90%, and now they're doing it again? Let's see on-chain data to speak, instead of just talking on paper.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeTherapist

· 5h ago

Surface data all look good, on-chain data is the real deal, this point is spot on.

View OriginalReply0

pvt_key_collector