2026-01-18 08:34:15

L1 blockchains should implement account abstraction as a native feature. The current account model based on EOA has many limitations—single signature verification, complex wallet interactions, and fragmented user experience. Account abstraction replaces external accounts with smart contract accounts, enabling flexible verification logic, batch operations, gas fee optimization, and seamless cross-chain interactions. This not only lowers the barrier to Web3 usage but also provides more design freedom for application layers. From Ethereum to Solana, mainstream L1s should prioritize this as a core solution rather than an optional feature to truly drive large-scale adoption.

ETH1.29%

SOL-1.07%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MerkleMaid

· 9h ago

Account abstraction should have been mandated a long time ago; don't keep it as an optional feature, because it's just a decoration. The EOA system is really annoying, always taking half a day to deal with.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 9h ago

It should have been like this a long time ago; the EOA approach is really outdated and dead. --- Account abstraction as a native feature? Sounds good, but who’s going to foot the bill? --- Alright, but I bet five dollars that Solana will still be delayed for another six months. --- If this thing could truly lower the barrier to entry, there wouldn’t be so many people still using CeFi. --- Finally someone said it. I’m just wondering why we’re still using stuff from the private key era. --- Good idea, but all the Layer 1s are competing on TPS. Who the heck cares about user experience? --- I believe in cross-chain interaction; everything else is just slogans. --- Another "should," but in reality?

View OriginalReply0

HashRatePhilosopher

· 9h ago

Basically, EOA should retire, and account abstraction has long needed native support. --- Gas fees are driving people crazy. In my opinion, account abstraction is a real necessity, not just a bonus. --- What are we still arguing about whether it's optional or not? Without this, large-scale adoption is simply a pipe dream. --- Wallet interactions are so complicated that ordinary users will be discouraged from the start. Account abstraction is indeed the remedy. --- Why hasn't Solana caught up yet? The direction for Ethereum is already clear. --- This is the real area where resources should be invested, much more practical than NFT skins. --- Seamless cross-chain interaction sounds good, but it must be truly achieved, not just talk. --- UX is the real ceiling for Web3. This is the right direction.

View OriginalReply0

MEVvictim

· 10h ago

It should have been done like this a long time ago; the EOA approach is really outdated.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoComedian

· 10h ago

Laughing and then crying, EOA is now like my mom's old flip phone—simple functions and damn easy to break.

View OriginalReply0

shadowy_supercoder

· 10h ago

It should have been like this a long time ago; the EOA approach is really outdated. --- Account abstraction is the key to saving Web3; right now, the experience is too fragmented. --- Exactly, but the problem is which L1 dares to take the lead and push aggressively... --- Gas optimization is the real pain point; finally, someone has addressed it properly. --- Many people want batch operations, but no one has provided a solution. --- If Solana really implements this system, they might hype it up again... --- Wait, how can wallets compete like this? It's a bit chaotic. --- Don't just talk about priorities; it depends on who has real implementation capability. --- Account abstraction = a revolution in user experience; this judgment is spot on.

View OriginalReply0