2026-01-18 10:24:07

This project is quite interesting. The development team has been continuously pushing forward. Based on the token design, the burn mechanism is expected to gradually return to the 1 billion level, and the overall voting trend also hints at this direction. To put it simply, truly promising projects are often overlooked and need more people to discover and recognize them. If you enter the market, making a profit is a gain; if you lose, consider it paying tuition and having a dream. This is the norm in the crypto market—some are happy, some are worried.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RugpullAlertOfficer

· 7h ago

Is the destruction mechanism returning to 1 billion? That logic is a bit far-fetched. What can the voting turnout trend really tell us? To put it nicely, it's basically just luck. There are many projects that get buried. This round of the contract looks quite standard; let's try a small amount first as usual. The team pushing forward is basic operation; the key is whether there will be actual progress later. A 1 billion level sounds quite impressive, but I'm afraid it's just on paper. It's profitable, but the risk with this kind of project is indeed not small, so be mentally prepared.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentLossEnjoyer

· 7h ago

Burning back to 1 billion does have some imagination space, but I've heard too many promises like this. Here are a few of my comment examples: If you make money, you make money; if you lose, pay tuition. I love this phrase. Voting rate trend? Bro, can you be more specific? Don't add fuel to the fire. If there's real potential, why hasn't anyone recognized it? Doesn't that itself indicate a problem? The 1 billion burning mechanism sounds good, but the key is whether the team will really stick to it. Being overlooked and truly having no prospects—sometimes it's really hard to tell the difference.

View OriginalReply0

CountdownToBroke

· 8h ago

Can the destruction mechanism be brought down? That's the key. It's hard to judge, feels like it's all a gamble on whether the team is reliable. Indeed, many good projects get buried, but there are also plenty of pitfalls. I've heard this kind of rhetoric too many times; you still need to do your own homework. Not all tuition fees are worth paying😅. Continuous progress by the team does not necessarily mean success; insights from those who have been through it.

View OriginalReply0