2026-01-18 10:26:44

Interestingly, the efficiency improvement of AI coding tools like Claude Code is really obvious. A developer shared his experience: using Claude Code, he completed a project that previously took him two weeks in just 30 minutes.

The specific technical approach is as follows: first, download all X data, then perform semantic embedding on each post, followed by dimensionality reduction with UMAP and clustering operations, and finally let the LLM automatically label each data cluster. Throughout the process, the output quality is actually better than manual processing before.

From several weeks to tens of minutes, this time difference reflects the significant advantages of AI-assisted coding in data processing and model debugging. For Web3 developers, such tools are changing the pace of rapid project iteration.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaNomad

· 8h ago

2 weeks in 30 minutes? Are you joking? That's a bit outrageous. Claude Code is indeed awesome, a blessing for lazy people. Really? The quality is even better? I’m a bit skeptical. Web3 has become so intense, I need to learn quickly. This efficiency... I have to try it, or I’ll be eliminated. Embedding + UMAP + LLM combo is truly unbeatable. Completing two weeks of work in 30 minutes, I have no choice. Wow, AI programming tools are about to dominate the development world. If the quality is even better, manual processing is really outdated.

View OriginalReply0

RamenStacker

· 8h ago

Whoa, shrinking from 2 weeks to 30 minutes? That's a pretty huge gap. Claude Code really has some substance... It truly liberates data processing. But I'm more curious—can the quality really surpass manual work? I need to try it myself. The Web3 folks really enjoy using this; the era of rapid iteration is here. Embedding + clustering + automatic tagging—this workflow is smooth, I feel like I'm out of the loop.

View OriginalReply0

TokenTaxonomist

· 8h ago

nah hold up, 2 weeks down to 30 mins? per my analysis that's statistically suspicious... either the initial implementation was catastrophically inefficient or we're looking at some serious selection bias here. the embedding + umap + clustering pipeline is solid enough but let me pull up my spreadsheet real quick because those timelines don't taxonomically check out

Reply0

SoliditySurvivor

· 8h ago

ngl this speed is really incredible, 2 weeks to 30 minutes? I have to try it Claude is really impressive in data processing, with embedding + clustering + tagging all in one Speaking of quality, is it even better? That's just too outrageous Web3 projects, get on it quickly, or you'll be left behind 30 minutes vs 2 weeks, this gap is more than enough to write an exciting article

View OriginalReply0