2026-01-18 10:27:31

The current state of blockchain networks is somewhat like real estate development—most projects cram all functionalities into a single entity, resulting in bloated structures and exorbitant renovation costs.

Dusk's recently released three-layer modular architecture is different. Its approach is very much like modern urban planning: functional zoning, clear responsibilities, and scientific efficiency.

**The architecture looks like this:**

The bottom layer is DuskDS. You can think of it as the city's infrastructure—foundations, power supply, water pipes—all sorted out. Here, consensus mechanisms, data availability verification, and final settlement are all handled, solidifying the network's security and stability.

The middle layer is DuskEVM application layer. This is like the city's commercial center. Its key advantage is full compatibility with Ethereum's development environment. What does this mean for developers? Ready-to-use tools and contract templates that can be used directly, without relearning a new system. Previously, integrating with exchanges might have taken several months of custom development; now it can be deployed in a few weeks.

The top layer is DuskVM privacy layer. Like a privacy zone within the city. It specifically provides privacy protection for financial transactions that require complete anonymity.

**What is the practical significance?**

The two main concerns of traditional financial institutions are: one, regulatory compliance; two, business secrets. Dusk's layered architecture cleverly solves this problem. Through technologies like homomorphic encryption at the application layer, transactions can be transparent and verifiable while sensitive data remains protected from leaks.

This modular design doubles development efficiency. From a certain perspective, the entire ecosystem has moved from an era of "custom tool development" to an era of "standardized industrial production."

DUSK53.4%

ETH1.29%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StakeTillRetire

· 8h ago

Wait, EVM compatibility can go live in a few weeks? How many times have I heard this? The real bottleneck is liquidity and users, not development time. Modular architecture is indeed good, but the Ethereum ecosystem has been playing with this for a while. Why can Dusk break through? Homomorphic encryption sounds high-end, but how many projects are actually implementing it? Still mostly impressive PowerPoint presentations. I'm interested in the privacy layer, but what are the details? No matter how well the architecture is designed, without a strong validator ecosystem, it's just a show. Ultimately, this depends on TVL and trading volume, don't just hype up the concept. The problem with modularity isn't about layering; it's about the cost and security of cross-layer communication. How are they solving this? Honestly, there are too many projects shouting about modularity now, but few can really get off the ground... Why does the name Dusk sound so awkward? It's easy to confuse with other projects. EVM compatibility ≠ ecosystem compatibility. Don't mix up this logic. Can privacy and compliance truly coexist? It feels like a false proposition.

View OriginalReply0

NFTFreezer

· 8h ago

Modular stuff sounds great, but can it really outperform those all-in-one projects? --- The three-layer architecture looks good, but the key is whether the ecosystem can keep up. --- Being compatible with EVM is definitely a plus, saving developers from having to learn a new language. --- How does the privacy layer ensure true privacy? Or is it just a gimmick? --- Double the efficiency? Let's wait and see user numbers and TPS data. --- Isn't this just拆散ing the bloated stuff? Sounds simple, but hard to actually do. --- Homomorphic encryption sounds high-end, but ordinary users can't really use these fancy tricks. --- It reminds me a bit of Cosmos's approach—long live modularity, but what about liquidity? --- The city planning analogy is pretty good, but fragmented ecosystems are really annoying. --- Ethereum compatibility is indeed a killer feature; without it, no one would migrate.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainRetirementHome

· 8h ago

Well said. Currently, most public chains are indeed bloated beyond reason, and making even small changes requires major surgery. I think Dusk's three-layer separation approach is quite good, especially the EVM compatibility—developers can directly use Ethereum tools, which definitely saves a lot of trouble and avoids the complexity of building a new ecosystem. Separating the privacy layer is also reasonable; traditional finance is indeed most afraid of data leaks. The layered architecture handles this requirement separately, which is quite considerate. However, whether it can truly be implemented depends on how it performs in practice—there are many projects that look good on paper. I feel that modularization is definitely the trend, but the issue is whether it can withstand market temptations and not ruin the original design. If Dusk can really hold on until the mainnet runs stably, it will be worth paying attention to. For now, let's wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

fren.eth

· 8h ago

Sounds good, but can this kind of architecture really avoid the domino effect in the future? Dusk's modular approach is indeed clear, but the question is whether the execution can keep up with what is said. An elegant architecture is one thing, but whether the ecosystem can truly attract developers is another. EVM compatibility really hits the pain point, saving developers the learning curve... which is definitely an advantage in competition. On the other hand, if the privacy layer is not done well, it’s the same as not doing it at all; once regulation comes, it’s still useless. Everyone is talking about modularity now, but the key is whether the implementation can maintain such a clean architecture. It's basically betting on whether Dusk can truly turn this city planning into a real city, not just a paper design.

View OriginalReply0

NotSatoshi

· 8h ago

Honestly, the modular approach should have been adopted a long time ago. Those previous projects were really long and stinky. Dusk's layered approach does have some substance, especially when connecting to the Ethereum ecosystem, which makes things easier. --- Separating the privacy layer is the right move; this is what financial experts understand. Unlike some chains that boast about privacy every day but are actually just empty talk. --- Homomorphic encryption is hyped up quite a bit, but how many can actually run it? It still depends on the actual deployment results. --- Modular architecture sounds very appealing, but the key is that security performance must not be compromised because of layering—that's the main point. --- Now there are all kinds of L2s and modular chains popping up. How are they differentiated? Does Dusk have anything special, or is it just copying existing ideas? --- Ethereum ecosystem compatibility really hits the pain point for developers. Deploying in a few weeks versus months of customization—that's a real advantage. --- Protecting business secrets is indeed a necessity for traditional financial institutions, but it must be truly implemented. A white paper looking good doesn't mean the product is solid.

View OriginalReply0