Bitcoin Reserve Rating New Tool: A Formula to Uncover Corporate Asset Allocation

2026-01-18 10:46:17

Abstract generation in progress

【Blockchain Rhythm】There’s an interesting new move— a well-known company has launched the “BTC Rating” indicator system on their official website. How is this indicator calculated? According to their product team, the formula is: ( Bitcoin reserves - debt - preferred shares + USD reserves ) / market capitalization.

Simply put, it’s the ratio of the company’s net Bitcoin reserves to its total market value. This way, investors can more intuitively see how much real assets the company holds in Bitcoin and USD, subtracting debt and preferred shares, and then measuring it relative to the company’s overall valuation. It sounds quite reasonable—the use of a quantitative metric to assess a company’s Bitcoin reserve adequacy.

This reflects the increasing market demand for transparency and traceability of Bitcoin reserves. As more institutions and companies get involved in Bitcoin, such rating indicators can indeed help outsiders quickly assess asset allocation strategies.

BTC-0.13%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

defi_detective

· 5h ago

Is this another set? No matter how nicely it's said, it's just a data game. Wait, can this formula truly reflect asset allocation? It still feels too superficial. High transparency? Ha, trusting the numbers reported by the company itself is questionable. This rating system sounds good, but the key is who will audit it. Bitcoin reserves definitely need standardization; I support this idea. The formula is simple and concise, but whether the market can really use it is another matter. Once institutions enter, BTC must undergo quantitative assessment. I understand, but the data authenticity is concerning. Standardization is important, but it always feels like some company sets the rules of the game. It doesn't matter what indicator system is used; the key is whether it can be verified on-chain. If you ask me, on-chain data is the safest, and this formula has limited significance. It's interesting, but I'm just worried it will become another marketing tool.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoPunster

· 5h ago

You're here to set formulas for us again, acting like a mathematician. If this BTC Rating could truly see through asset allocation, I wouldn't have been losing money so long ago. Anyway, this indicator is just about taking the on-balance coins and dollars, subtracting preferred debt, and dividing by market cap—sounds reasonable, but in the end, it all depends on how the big players want to tweak the parameters. High transparency wouldn't make me suffer this much either, just smiling through this loss. Whether Bitcoin reserves are large or not doesn't really matter; the key is whether this company can help me break even, right everyone?

View OriginalReply0

PumpDoctrine

· 6h ago

Hmm... This formula looks good, but can we trust the real data? Just another story about "transparency." As for BTC reserves, the key is still who is holding and how they are holding. Finally, someone wants to quantify this, not bad. Isn't this just a health checkup for institutional players? The numbers look nice, but on-chain verification is the real way to go. Wait, could this indicator become a new tool for cutting leeks... The formula is easy to calculate, but how can we trust the "USD reserves" part? I just want to know if someone is using this to fool retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

ChainMemeDealer

· 6h ago

Another rating system is launched, feels a bit over-quantified. The formula looks reasonable, but how many companies truly dare to showcase their BTC reserves? The demand for transparency is real, but there's also a lot of room for data falsification. BTC reserves have become the new business card, hilarious. Miners and institutions are competing to see who has more BTC, and next, it’s the listed companies’ turn to compete internally. The more ratings there are, the easier it is for investors to get confused; it still depends on actual holdings. Adding a BTC column to company financial reports—this era is really here. The problem is, if this metric gets corrupted, what do we do? Do we need to develop Rating 2.0?

View OriginalReply0