#MSCI未来或纳入数字资产财库企业 **The 3 Core Strategies of Trading: From Technical Analysis to Precise Positioning**



Many people ask me, why can some traders grasp the daily rhythm in 30 minutes, while I keep watching the charts every day and still incur losses? Honestly, it’s not a matter of insufficient effort; the methodology just falls short in these three areas.

**First Pitfall: Being Repeatedly Educated by Trends**

Short-term trading is often cut short, and the root cause is misjudging the direction. My usual approach is to start with the weekly chart—if the weekly EMA21 is upward, I only consider bullish ideas; if downward, I focus on bearish opportunities. It’s not a mystical indicator, but a way to prevent myself from trading against the trend blindly. Then, I look for rhythm on the daily chart, and use Fibonacci on the 4-hour chart to anchor key levels. This adds a layer of framework constraints, making my mindset more stable.

**Second Opportunity: The "Withdrawal Password" at Key Levels**

Whether support levels can hold or resistance levels can be broken often determines the subsequent trend. But it’s not just about seeing if it breaks or not; volume must also be considered. When support levels encounter buying without volume contraction, the probability of continuing to go long is higher; for resistance breakouts, confirmation with increased volume is necessary, as a volume dry breakout often leads to a pullback. This logic runs through many of my trades.

**Third Signal: The Rhythm of High-Probability Entries**

When the 4-hour MACD just crosses above the waterline, and RSI shows an oversold rebound, this time window has a relatively high success rate for going long. Another confirmation is when the daily EMA7 crosses above EMA21, which often indicates a brewing reversal. Once a key level is broken with volume increasing (more than doubling), the risk-reward ratio of entering at that point becomes worth considering.

The core logic is this—trend provides direction, key levels give position, signals give rhythm. When these three elements work smoothly together, you can save half of your time costs.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MiningDisasterSurvivorvip
· 7h ago
You're teaching people how to lose money again, huh... I've been through it all. The technical analysis methods from 2018 were still getting beaten down.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractWorkervip
· 7h ago
It's that same weekly EMA theory again. It sounds good in theory, but when it comes to actual trading, the market turns around and you're still getting cut.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfervip
· 7h ago
Weekly EMA + volume confirmation. I also use this combination; it's much more convenient than just looking at candlesticks.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeNomadvip
· 7h ago
ngl, the multi-timeframe routing here is solid but missing the critical risk layer—volume confirmation without liquidity fragmentation checks is how you bleed slippage on support breaks. seen this exact setup get exploited during the luna bridge collapse aftermath.
Reply0
BrokenYieldvip
· 7h ago
nah, the framework sounds clean but most people still gonna chase wicks and blow up anyway. risk management beats perfect entry every time, no cap.
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)