2026-01-18 11:32:19

In the Ethereum ecosystem, doing DeFi trading feels like putting your wallet in a glass showcase in the middle of the street. Every transaction, every position is permanently recorded on the blockchain. Want to hide? It's simply impossible. Passersby can see it, hackers can see it, and regulatory agencies can see it even more.

This is the core issue—the lack of financial privacy.

Some projects are trying to break this "full transparency" deadlock. For example, privacy-focused public chains like Dusk are like installing one-way glass on your assets. Outside observers can see liquidity moving, compliance departments can verify your identity information, but ordinary users and automated attack mechanisms cannot see through your true holdings. You control the "visibility" of your transactions.

Think about why traditional finance has lasted for hundreds of years. Because bank accounts are inherently private. Your deposit numbers are not freely visible to anyone on the street. For crypto finance to truly mature, privacy protection must be standard, not a luxury.

A financial system without privacy ultimately becomes a giant hunting ground. Hackers have clear targets, regulators have detailed records, and participants are exposed to all risks. The trust in finance, after all, is built on privacy.

ETH0.57%

DUSK46.22%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BTCWaveRider

· 5h ago

That's it, it's long overdue to compete in the privacy track --- The transparent on-chain world is indeed a bit outrageous, feeling like dancing naked --- Solutions like Dusk sound good, but it depends on how the actual adoption rate turns out --- The problem is most people don't care about privacy at all, as long as they can make money --- One-way glass? Sounds good, but implementing it might introduce new security risks --- Traditional financial privacy mechanisms have always been problematic, and now crypto is even worse --- So in the end, you still have to rely on your own technology to ensure privacy, don't expect platforms to help you proactively --- This logic makes sense, but will regulators allow privacy-level features like this? --- I agree, a chain without privacy is just an information highway, a hacker's paradise --- The key is to balance privacy and compliance; that's the real challenge

View OriginalReply0

Degen4Breakfast

· 5h ago

The glass showcase analogy is brilliant, that's why I don't touch public chains. --- Dusk sounds good but I still don't believe it; privacy protocols will eventually be broken. --- Damn, that's why my holdings never exceed three months; it's too easy to be sniped. --- One-way glass? Sounds like a new excuse for money laundering haha, regulators have been watching this already. --- Traditional financial confidentiality isn't a big deal, but can you compare stablecoins and ETH? --- A system without privacy = a highlight, it's not just about risk, it can lead to outright failure. --- Wait, can something like Dusk really prevent the FBI? Feels like self-deception. --- So the big players are using mixers + Tornado, but privacy protocols are still too immature. --- Financial privacy, at its core, is a cat-and-mouse game; there's no absolute shield. --- Blockchain's permanent record is a paradox; decentralization and privacy—fish and bear's paw.

View OriginalReply0

consensus_whisperer

· 5h ago

Buddy, this is the truth. Privacy is indeed a major weakness in encrypted finance. Glass windows are indeed a perfect metaphor, but I think a worse situation is for those DeFi whales, who have become prey. Projects like Dusk are on the right track, but can they really achieve one-way glass? Or is it just another idealistic promise? Traditional finance has been around for so long, and frankly, there are still barriers and thresholds. Our side is all open-source code, how can it be completely private... unless we really use hard tech like zero-knowledge proofs. The most practical approach is to be cautious and not put all your assets on the chain. That's the safest privacy protection method.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 5h ago

It's true that words matter, but can privacy solutions like Dusk really work? I always feel there might be bugs someday. --- So privacy coins are always disliked by exchanges, which is quite ironic. --- The glass showcase analogy is spot on. Right now, on-chain transactions do feel like nudity. --- Wait, a one-way mirror sounds good, but the practical implementation might be quite challenging. --- Privacy is indeed a necessity, but it seems not many people actually use it. --- The phrase "hunting ground for hackers" hits hard. Every time I see large address holdings, I get worried. --- The comparison to bank confidentiality is valid, but encryption was originally designed to counter privacy. --- I haven't heard of Dusk. Are these privacy public chains reliable, or are they just another concept coin? --- If privacy isn't addressed, I'm really worried about large transactions. --- Financial trust is built on privacy. This makes sense in traditional finance, but blockchain itself is inherently anti-privacy.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsDetective

· 5h ago

Honestly, over-the-top transparency is a disaster. Hackers are watching, I’m watching, regulators are watching... everyone can see, so what’s called finance? Dusk’s approach is good, but we need to ask if it really works. Privacy is necessary for peace of mind; otherwise, you’re always on edge. Traditional finance keeps privacy tightly protected, while we’re completely exposed... the gap is indeed huge. Privacy isn’t cheating; it’s a basic right. I’m optimistic about privacy-focused projects, but just don’t get caught off guard.

View OriginalReply0