2026-01-18 11:32:24

The recent crypto market has been stirred by a wave— the concept of "AI Agent Economy" has surged against the trend, and related tokens have responded accordingly. The surface story is very appealing: AI agents evolve from passive chart analysis to actively managing wallets and executing DeFi strategies. But when this wave of enthusiasm subsides, a hidden, colder technological reality comes into view: these increasingly autonomous and "valuable" AI agents generate massive interaction records daily, accumulate learning experiences, and rely on various "means of production" to execute tasks. Where should all this data go?

This is not a small problem. Can traditional centralized servers suffice? Clearly not— the autonomy of these agents is constrained by the architecture itself. So what about decentralized storage? How can we break the deadlock between cost, security, and availability?

The answer determines not just the superficial question of "Can AI trade cryptocurrencies," but also how large the entire agent economy can grow and whether it can be truly sustainable.

Conversely, an AI agent that conducts autonomous on-chain transactions embodies both value and fragility— two sides of the same coin. It continuously learns optimal strategies through trial and error— every successful arbitrage, every failed interaction is valuable experience data. But where this data is stored and who protects it directly determines the "lifecycle" of the agent. Data loss, tampering, or hijacking by centralized platforms would strip the agent of its core competitiveness. This is the Achilles' heel of the agent economy.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NotGonnaMakeIt

· 7h ago

Another wave of concept hype, who really cares about the underlying technology? --- Storage issues are indeed key, but the ecosystem isn't ready yet. --- Basically, the problem still hasn't been solved regarding data security; the risks are huge. --- Decentralized storage is too costly; it's simply not feasible. --- It feels like a beautiful vision paired with real-world difficulties—just the old tricks. --- The autonomy and security of intelligent agents are inherently contradictory; there's no clear choice. --- Centralization will definitely die, but decentralization costs explode; there's no way out in the middle. --- Once data is tampered with or lost, it's game over; who dares to take that risk? --- Sounds high-end, but it's really just the storage problem not being solved—still just pie in the sky. --- The Achilles' heel metaphor is quite apt, but investors simply can't see it.

View OriginalReply0

RetailTherapist

· 7h ago

Basically, it's a question of how data is stored. It sounds impressive, but in the end, it's still stuck here. Do you really think AI will help you make money? First, solve data security before bragging. Another beautifully packaged pseudo-need. If storage costs soar, it's game over. Data sovereignty is the real way to go; otherwise, all efforts are pointless. Centralized storage = intelligent agent is still just a pet. Who believes in this? Waiting for news of data being hacked amidst this hype, haha. The cost of decentralized storage is simply unaffordable; capital has the insight. Ultimately, it's a pseudo-proposition. Technical issues can't be solved, and no matter how hot the concept, it's useless. Smart agents doing on-chain transactions? I'm more concerned about who is stealing their data. Let's see who can truly solve the storage problem. Right now, it's all just storytelling.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBro

· 7h ago

The reasoning is sound, but data storage is indeed a critical bottleneck. To put it simply, it's still a trust issue—who dares to let AI handle the money on its own? It looks promising, but the details are full of pitfalls.

View OriginalReply0

StopLossMaster

· 7h ago

Well said. Data is indeed the bottleneck issue, and centralized storage is like shackling AI. Decentralized storage costs are so high; who will foot the bill? It's just another concept hype; the real infrastructure is still far away. AI autonomous trading sounds great, but if data security isn't guaranteed, everything is pointless. Only after this wave of hype fades will the real test begin.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-4745f9ce

· 7h ago

Honestly, this wave of AI proxy coin trading is just old wine in new bottles. Data storage issues are the real pitfall. Wait, can decentralized storage really solve this? The costs might explode. Look, now everywhere is touting AI autonomous trading, but no one really explains how data is protected. The AI agent coins bought earlier are now crashing hard. I should have asked this question from the start. Well said, the Achilles' heel metaphor is perfect—losing data really means game over. Centralized storage limits autonomy, decentralized storage is expensive and slow. How can this be solved? It seems more complicated than "Can AI be used for trading coins." Most people haven't even realized this. So in the end, do we still need a new storage solution? Is there a team working on this? Ridiculous, they're just cutting leeks again. Data security isn't even solved yet, and they're already raising funds.

View OriginalReply0

RunWithRugs

· 8h ago

Damn, here comes another narrative about cutting leeks... Data storage is indeed a dead end, but is anyone really solving it? --- That’s quite a punch to the gut. Decentralized storage costs are a disaster once you break them down; no one wants to fork out that kind of money. --- Wait, isn’t this just saying that current AI agents are all pseudo-demand? I think you hit the nail on the head. --- The perspective of data lifecycle is good, but it still feels too idealistic... The actual projects that can be done are less than half. --- The two sides of the coin are well said, but the problem is that no one is really using decentralized storage for production-level stuff now, right? --- Achilles’ heel... Haha, that’s a bit of an exaggeration, but it’s definitely a pit that can’t be bypassed. --- So this wave of AI agent price hikes is just hype? I don’t believe no one saw this coming. --- Uh... I think a traditional server + some hybrid solution might be the realistic way out, but who asked us to live in a world that needs to be fully decentralized?

View OriginalReply0