2026-01-18 12:25:49

Interesting! I just went to bed last night, and when I woke up, I was completely stunned—A certain meme coin's total supply jumped from 2.577 billion directly to 2.652 billion, an instant issuance of 100 million tokens! This issuance speed is truly more outrageous than a printing press.

You might think you're holding a scarce asset, but in reality, with a single click behind the scenes, your share of the holdings is immediately diluted. We've seen this kind of drama many times—project teams always cloak it as ecological development, but in fact, it's blatant issuance and harvesting.

But upon reflection, where does the problem really lie? Honestly, we are too easily fooled by "stories," and end up ignoring the most core rule: **Supply is not transparent, and can change at will—this asset's value foundation is just a pile of sand**.

So now I've learned to be smarter—never again will I put large positions into assets that might secretly increase supply or suddenly unlock. What I need to find are assets with fully transparent on-chain rules, clear supply mechanisms, and real value anchoring.

For example, those ecosystems built around stablecoins. They don't play "supply magic"; all mechanisms are written on-chain, and all changes can be verified. No backdoor operations, no sudden unlocks—it's this kind of certainty that truly reassures people. This is also why more and more people are starting to reevaluate what is truly worth betting on.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

3 Likes

Reward
3
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OptionWhisperer

· 5h ago

100 million tokens? Oh my, the dilution is so severe that it feels like the holdings have instantly shrunk. That's why I only deal with transparent on-chain assets now; everything else is just a gamble on luck. Only when the contracts are tightly written do I dare to hold a heavy position; otherwise, it's all just air. It seems I still need to keep an eye on on-chain data myself and not be fooled by stories. The stablecoin approach is indeed reliable, at least there's no behind-the-scenes manipulation. This time I paid my tuition; next time I choose projects, I need to be even more ruthless.

View OriginalReply0

NotSatoshi

· 6h ago

One hundred million tokens appeared out of nowhere, this move is really incredible, I was stunned --- So, don’t be fooled by those whitepapers that blow things out of proportion --- See the truth on the blockchain, everything else is虚的 --- Stablecoin ecosystems are indeed more reliable, at least the rules are there --- Another classic "ecosystem construction" harvest, the套路 is old and well-known --- Realized it now, I will never touch this kind of thing where the backend can change data at will --- Basically, it’s information asymmetry, we are always the last to know --- This is the real "money printer," even more outrageous than the central bank --- Now I understand, transparency is the way to go --- Been educated again, but the tuition was too expensive

View OriginalReply0

RugpullSurvivor

· 6h ago

One hundred million coins disappeared in an instant, this method is truly brilliant. --- Still the same trick, first talk about the ecosystem then increase issuance, perfectly harvesting. --- It's high time to recognize that without on-chain transparency, it's just a gamble. --- Scarcity has always been an illusion; project teams can destroy it with a single click. --- I used to fall for it before, now I only look at the mechanism, not the story. --- Assets whose supply can be arbitrarily changed are worth nothing. --- That's why I must keep a close eye on on-chain data and never let go. --- I used to believe in "the next Bitcoin," but now, haha. --- I've learned my lesson; I'd rather earn less than sacrifice transparency and certainty.

View OriginalReply0

PerpetualLonger

· 6h ago

Back at it again? Learning to be smart, huh? Next time, you'll still be full-tilt bottom fishing. --- Damn, that's why I refuse to reduce my position. The more it drops, the more I buy. --- Sounds good, but honestly, it's just because I can't bear to take a loss. --- Alright, I believe you've really turned over a new leaf this time haha. --- Transparent supply? Ha, when the bull market comes, you'll understand what faith really means. --- You're just self-hypnotizing again. I think in three months you'll be back to bottom fishing. --- Why are you telling me this? Just tell me when it will go up. --- This logic makes sense, but I just want to know how to break even right now. --- Stablecoin ecosystem... Eh, doesn't sound that exciting. --- I'm just here waiting to be liquidated; I'm already numb anyway.

View OriginalReply0

GasWhisperer

· 6h ago

caught that 1B mint in real time... mempool didn't even flinch before it hit, classic supply opacity play

Reply0

NFT_Therapy

· 6h ago

Putting in 100 million coins directly, this move is really incredible... Turns out our "scarce assets" can depreciate so easily.

View OriginalReply0

governance_lurker

· 6h ago

Wow, an additional 100 million tokens issued? That's directly diluting my holdings. The project team is really outrageous. I've been fooled by stories too many times. Now I only trust on-chain rules. Stablecoin ecosystems are indeed more reliable, with fewer tricks and schemes. It's better to look for a fixed supply mechanism to avoid being exploited again. This move has made me realize that true assets must withstand on-chain verification.

View OriginalReply0

TokenVelocityTrauma

· 6h ago

One hundred million coins suddenly appeared out of nowhere, this tactic is absolutely brilliant, even the printing press would be ashamed. --- It's the same old story, claiming transparency in supply is nonsense, just a one-click operation off-chain. --- Dilution is really harsh, the holding ratio shrinks instantly, these should have been warned about long ago. --- Exactly, no matter how good the story sounds, you have to look at on-chain data; otherwise, it's just a casino. --- That's why I only focus on those with fixed rules that can't be changed. --- Ecosystem construction? Haha, translating that as finding ways to cut leeks. --- The stablecoin ecosystem is indeed more solid, with fewer twists and turns. --- It’s always the same, waking up to find your share has evaporated a bit. --- The core issue is that no one can truly restrict the project team; what’s the use of on-chain transparency? --- I've learned my lesson and will never trust those overly elaborate whitepapers again.

View OriginalReply0