Recently, an interesting market sentiment has been circulating — 2026 is likely to be the most divisive year in crypto history. The traditional halving cycle seems to be hinting that the market should adjust, but the strong support from US policy circles is signaling a "super cycle." When these two forces clash, investors are faced with a big dilemma: should they be aggressive or cautious?



However, from this chaos, some clues can be seen. When market sentiment is swinging wildly, things that offer you "certainty of returns" become especially valuable. For example, projects that focus on deep integration with mainstream public chains and aim to reduce user costs have become safe harbors.

Think about it — in volatile markets, what are investors most afraid of? Not being able to see clearly or manage risks effectively. So now, some platforms are starting to play the real "combination punch" — lowering borrowing costs to below 3%, allowing you to finance at low cost to capture higher yields from other channels, which is a safe arbitrage space; on the other hand, they are introducing RWA products, such as on-chain assets pegged to US Treasuries, with annualized yields stable between 3.65% and 4.71%. Imagine that — it’s like installing a "magnet" in your crypto asset allocation.

This logic is quite clear: avoid the most aggressive speculation, and don’t engage in purely high-risk gambles. Instead, aim to build yourself into the "yield infrastructure" of the crypto world. Whether through staking for interest or diversified lending, the core idea is to make capital flow more efficiently and securely. If you also hold related governance tokens and lock them in, you can currently earn close to 40% annualized rewards — which is attractive for those optimistic about long-term development.

Looking ahead to the roadmap, these projects have a clear expansion plan for the first half of the year: to launch on Ethereum, diversify into physical asset classes, and experiment with on-chain credit lending. This isn’t just a simple version update; it’s about weaving a denser, more diverse network of yields amid uncertainty.

In plain terms, when the market is full of conflicting opinions, projects that consistently focus on reducing user costs and providing tangible, stable returns are more likely to weather the cycle fluctuations. They don’t promise huge profits but offer a sense of "peace of mind." In a year of divergence, such choices might be exactly what many cautious investors are looking for.
ETH0.57%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ContractFreelancervip
· 4h ago
Honestly, the game in 2026 is really chaotic. One side is halving while policies are being aggressively promoted. Who dares to say they see through it all? However, this article has laid out my thoughts—rather than betting on a sudden surge, it's better to look for steady returns. The combination of 3% lending plus RWA is indeed attractive, and being able to sleep peacefully at night is valuable. A 40% annualized reward sounds outrageous, but if you’re willing to lock in long-term, it’s still somewhat interesting.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsShamanvip
· 4h ago
It sounds like another marketing tactic of "stable returns," but I have to say that a 3% lending cost really isn't a lie. A 40% annualized lock-up period is also tempting, but it depends on whether the roadmap can actually be implemented. How many times have they talked about Ethereum scalability? The real safety net should be managing your own risks well, rather than being blinded by a project's promises. This round is a bit more interesting, at least more reliable than pure speculation. However, the divergence year 2026 sounds like a new narrative template. Everyone, don't be too fooled by the tricks.
View OriginalReply0
CexIsBadvip
· 4h ago
Low-cost lending paired with RWA, this combination is indeed attractive, much more reliable than those hype air coins that are blown every day. 40% annualized return is a bit tempting, but it depends on the project's actual operation. Don't become the next scam case again. Disagreement year 2026? I actually think that a conservative strategy is most popular at this time; aggressive players have all been wiped out by volatility. This logic is clear. Instead of betting on super cycles, it's better to secure basic returns. Sleeping well at night is indeed more satisfying than making quick money. Logging into Ethereum, credit lending... this route looks serious, but how do you calculate the risk of token unlocks? Feels like this is talking about a specific project again, but the idea isn't bad. I'm optimistic about RWA. On-chain government bond products are generally more reliable than pure speculation, although the returns aren't as outrageous. The true safe haven isn't high returns, but your understanding of what it's doing. This article is half right. Reducing costs itself is valuable. Don't just look at the annualized figures; liquidity and risk control are the core.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTonguevip
· 4h ago
40% annualized return is indeed eye-catching, but when it comes to actually investing, it depends on whether the liquidity is deep enough. These days, stable returns are worth much more than promises of quick wealth. I understand the importance of sleeping peacefully. Disagreement year 2026? Alright, anyway, I’m betting that RWA will come through.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)