2026-01-18 12:31:45

Regarding $Jager's token design, many people are easily intimidated by the surface numbers of "high taxes." In fact, the 36% deflationary + burn mechanism creates a positive cycle — reducing circulation directly increases scarcity. Looking at the distribution structure makes it clear: 50% dividends go directly to holders, while only 14% is used for project operations (marketing + maintenance costs). Projects without this investment are unlikely to go far; website, marketing, and community maintenance all require funding.

Another interesting perspective is the psychological game among holders. Some say they hold tokens without moving because they fear losses, but what if the market really multiplies several times? Even the most rational people, when faced with multi-fold gains, can't resist the urge to sell despite parental advice. This precisely demonstrates how strong the project's inherent appeal and market expectations are.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

5 Likes

Reward
5
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SudoRm-RfWallet/

· 4h ago

36% deflation sounds scary, but in reality, it's just helping us raise prices. Scarcity is the most valuable thing. 50% dividends go directly to holders, and the remaining 14% is for project development. I respect this ratio. Projects that can truly increase several times, regardless of their rationality, will attract all the retail investors. Coins with no liquidity die very quickly; this guy has a pretty clear understanding. The psychological game is spot on; in front of interests, everyone loses their mind, haha. The 36% tax initially seems outrageous, but on the other hand, scarcity can indeed drive the market up. 50% is allocated to coin holders, and the rest is spent on operations. This logic is quite clever. If the market really multiplies several times, no matter what you say, people will definitely sell. I believe in the deflation mechanism, but the key is whether there are real scenarios to support it.

View OriginalReply0

NFT_Therapy

· 4h ago

Damn, finally someone explained it clearly. What's wrong with 36% deflation? People in the crypto world are really easily fooled by numbers, not paying attention to distribution. Getting 50% dividends is the real hardcore move. Operations only take 14%? Haha, that's really stingy, but what does that say? This psychological game I’m totally impressed with. That was really intense. In front of multiple times returns, who can stay rational? Honestly, Jager's design is a bit brilliant.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationHunter

· 4h ago

36% deflation sounds intimidating, but this logic is indeed well understood; scarcity is the key. --- 50% dividends directly to you, this is a straightforward profit distribution, unlike some projects that just hype. --- The psychological game among holders was amazing; when the price really multiplies, who would still be rational? Who's parents' words are useless then? --- Wait, can reducing circulation truly increase scarcity? Or does it depend on trading volume? --- 14% operational costs aren't much, but the key is how the money is spent, right? --- Haha, saying people are afraid of losses is actually overthinking; it's only when you can't make money that you call it fear. --- The dividend model is indeed more honest than some projects. --- The psychological game part was interesting, but reality is often more painful. --- Scarcity increase depends on having a sucker to take over, brother.

View OriginalReply0

ChainBrain

· 4h ago

36% deflationary design is okay, but I'm worried it only looks good on paper. Honestly, the 50% dividend share is the key; it must actually be sent to the wallet. I agree with the psychological game part; who the hell can resist the temptation of several times the returns?

View OriginalReply0

RumbleValidator

· 4h ago

The core of the 36% deflationary mechanism lies in node validation efficiency; reducing circulation directly enhances network reliability, which is the key.

View OriginalReply0

GhostWalletSleuth

· 4h ago

36% deflationary sounds scary but actually it’s increasing scarcity, those who understand know Wait, 50% dividends to token holders? I need to think about this logic again Honestly, when the market really rises, who can resist selling? Don’t mention parental advice, even ghosts can’t stop it 14% operational cost sounds quite reasonable, unlike some projects that drain blood and sweat The psychological game hits the mark; fear and greed are just a thought apart The real question is how long can this 36% tax last? Scarcity will eventually run out too A high dividend ratio makes me a bit suspicious; high returns usually come with pitfalls Are token holders really rational? I doubt it, it’s just greed outweighing reason Is the official website and community maintenance cost really only 14%? That number seems a bit low

View OriginalReply0