2026-01-18 12:35:49

The LGNS token on the Origin platform is about to undergo significant changes. According to the latest plan, the project will officially launch a new token burn system on January 25, 2026.

This burn plan involves a substantial amount of tokens being permanently removed. Through this mechanism, the number of LGNS in circulation will be significantly reduced, which is a typical deflationary design. Based on historical experience, a genuine reduction in supply often provides price support—when available tokens decrease while demand remains stable or even increases, a price rise becomes a reasonable market response.

Currently, the number of global LGNS holder addresses is approaching 2 million, indicating that the community base is continuously expanding. If the burn system is launched as scheduled, coupled with the growing number of holders, there is still room for market expectations for future developments. Of course, the price performance of any token is ultimately determined by multiple factors; burning is just one part of the equation.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseVagabond

· 4h ago

Wait, is the figure of 2 million addresses really serious? Seems a bit suspicious. If the LGNS burn is truly executed this time, we should definitely pay attention to the changes in supply. Next January? We’ll have to wait until then, and there might be other variables by that time. Don’t put too much faith in claims of price support; the key is whether people are actually using this thing. Having many addresses holding the coin isn’t necessarily a good thing; maybe they’re just small retail investors hoarding it or something.

View OriginalReply0

TrustMeBro

· 4h ago

Does reduced supply necessarily mean prices will rise? Why do I feel something's missing in this logic... 2 million addresses sound impressive, but how many actual bagholders are there? --- I've heard the burning mechanism explanation too many times. The key is whether there is actual application support for demand later on. --- They are only starting to burn in January next year. Bringing this up now... is a bit early, what if there are more variables in the meantime? --- Deflation sounds good, but it requires a continuous influx of new traffic. Otherwise, it's just distributing chips to early investors. --- How did they get the data of 2 million addresses? What's the real active user count? That's the real question. --- Prices are ultimately determined by multiple factors... This statement is basically meaningless. Do you think it's a good time or not?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter9000

· 4h ago

Does burning really have the potential to drive the market up? Seeing 2 million addresses is quite intimidating, but I feel like I've seen this kind of deflation tactic too many times... It's not starting until January next year? It seems like the hype around this kind of news is more about speculation than actual impact, but anyway, just some idle money to gamble with. Why does it all seem like storytelling? Reducing supply ≠ rising prices, what about demand? 2 million addresses sound like a lot, but how many are actually holding? This kind of destruction mechanism feels a bit like a prelude to cutting the leeks, waiting to see what happens next. Purely burning coins isn't enough; there needs to be real application, otherwise it's just a numbers game. 2026? That's still more than a year away, will you remember this by then? Haha. Liquidity wasn't mentioned, how do you sell it...

View OriginalReply0

ConsensusDissenter

· 4h ago

It's another round of burning and shrinking supply. How many times has this trick been played... 2 million addresses sound like a lot, but how many actually hold? Wait, it doesn't start until January 2026? What's the hype now? Reduced supply = price increase? The logic is correct, but the premise is that someone has to buy in, brother. Honestly, I’ve never understood LGNS. It just feels like they promote it every time, and then... nothing happens. Look at how other projects are still harvesting new investors. Can Origin come up with a different trick this time?

View OriginalReply0

GasWaster

· 4h ago

Are you trying to pump coins again? It's all just a scam anyway, just wait to get cut.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTherapist

· 4h ago

2 million addresses sound like a lot, but how many are truly holders... Just burn this thing, my ears are already calloused from hearing about it. Whether this wave can really drive the market up depends on the funds, brother. They're only burning in January 2026, are you really not afraid of a 50% drop if you buy now? It's the same old supply-side deflation story, even the poop bowl is being blamed on coin burning. What kind of move is LGNS making? Let's wait and see, I don't hold much anyway.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiAnon

· 4h ago

Another destruction expectation is coming. Speaking of the 2 million holder addresses, that number sounds quite impressive. What percentage of them are truly active? Wait, burning in 2026? That’s still over a year away. Can the market stay hot that long? Less supply means higher prices? I’ve heard that logic too many times. The key is still whether people buy. NGL, these deflationary mechanisms are everywhere. If you ask me, it depends on how the ecosystem develops later. Pure burning of coins is useless. Really want to see what the market will look like when the burning happens. Can’t bet on it.

View OriginalReply0