2026-01-18 13:25:57

Most people focus on chain-to-chain rivalries. But the real game? It's about who cracks the user acquisition code first. That's where the actual competitive edge lives—whoever figures out how to bring in users at scale without bleeding capital will own the ecosystem. Acquisition costs aren't just a metric; they're the moat that determines winners and losers in this space.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-bd883c58

· 5h ago

To be honest, those still arguing over which chain is more powerful have already been eliminated. The real winners have long shifted their focus to user acquisition costs. Whoever can bring in the most users with the least amount of money is the boss.

View OriginalReply0

SchroedingerGas

· 5h ago

That's right, the chain war has long been settled; now it's all about who can cheaply attract users. But I think what's even harder is retaining them. If customer acquisition costs are low but user retention is at the bottom, what's the point...

View OriginalReply0

SchrödingersNode

· 5h ago

That's true, but the problem is that most projects don't even understand basic operations and are still trying to overtake on the bend.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMuskRat

· 5h ago

Honestly, what's being hyped up now about competition between chains is missing the point entirely. The real brutal reality is the ability to acquire new users—this is the true moat.

View OriginalReply0