Stablecoins are redefining the rules of cross-border payments. Data from 2025 shows that the annual transaction volume of stablecoins has surpassed $12 trillion, with cross-border payments accounting for 47%. This growth rate is already challenging the ceiling of traditional payment networks. In contrast, they are irreversibly transforming the underlying logic of the global settlement system.



Hong Kong's recent policy actions are particularly noteworthy—36 stablecoin license applications are about to be approved, with reserve assets limited to Hong Kong dollar cash and government bonds. This directly upgrades stablecoins from market tools to "on-chain fiat currencies." With a 24-hour redemption mechanism and second-level settlement capability, foreign trade merchants in the Pearl River Delta have already sensed the opportunity. They are testing stablecoins as a replacement for traditional cross-border remittances, reducing fees from 3% to a few basis points.

However, the ambitions of stablecoins go far beyond payments. The vertical integration case of FRAX is very insightful—using U.S. Treasuries as collateral, Fraxtal L2 ecosystem utilizing FRAX for Gas, and integrating banking interfaces. This combination creates a complete closed loop of "stablecoin + application layer + financing channels." Such architecture is widely adopted by institutions and also indicates that stablecoins are evolving from simple transaction media into more complex financial infrastructure.

The overlay effect of the RWA (Real-World Asset) track is even more noteworthy. When traditional financial assets are tokenized, stablecoins are needed as the benchmark unit and transaction medium, further strengthening their central role in the ecosystem. To some extent, the role of mainstream public chain tokens is gradually broadening, while stablecoins are continuously reinforcing their core functions.
FRAX41%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RadioShackKnightvip
· 3h ago
12 trillion? Damn, stablecoins are about to skyrocket. Traditional banks should be trembling.
View OriginalReply0
FundingMartyrvip
· 3h ago
Once the 36 licenses in Hong Kong are issued, the foreign trade guys in the Pearl River Delta will immediately smell blood. That 3% fee rate is really damn... Turning stablecoins into on-chain fiat currency indeed changes the game, but I still find the FRAX combo a bit questionable... The combination of RWA+ stablecoins makes it seem like mainstream public chain coins are really going to cool off... The number 12 trillion sounds impressive, but the 47% cross-border share is the key. Traditional remittance systems deserve to be disrupted...
View OriginalReply0
probably_nothing_anonvip
· 3h ago
1.2 trillion in transaction volume? Hong Kong license approval? Oh my, this is truly the moment of a major turnaround. Transaction fees in the per-thousand range, traditional banks are really starting to panic this time. The closed-loop logic of FRAX is indeed brilliant; stablecoins are really becoming the infrastructure of finance. RWA on-chain paired with stablecoins, the hub position is becoming more and more solid... Are mainstream public chain tokens about to be sidelined? The foreign trade merchants in the Pearl River Delta are really taking a risk, cutting 3% down to dozens of basis points...
View OriginalReply0
Ser_APY_2000vip
· 3h ago
1.2 trillion is that number real, it needs to be verified before believing --- The policy in Hong Kong means that stablecoins will have formal regulation, it feels like the competition will intensify later --- FRAX's architecture is indeed powerful, but whether it can truly be implemented is still uncertain --- Cross-border exchange fees dropping from 3% to per thousand, if that's true, foreign trade merchants would have already gone crazy --- Stablecoins are increasingly resembling infrastructure, mainstream coins are a bit awkward --- But honestly, how long these policy benefits can last is still a question --- The combination of RWA and stablecoins feels like building a parallel financial system? --- I'm optimistic about stablecoins, but don't be fooled by these data --- Are traditional payment networks really about to be disrupted? I don't feel that way --- Hong Kong has 36 licenses, but how many will actually be successfully implemented
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt