Balancing privacy and transparency has always been a core challenge for blockchain implementation. Think about it—businesspeople would never lay their ledgers on the street for everyone to see, but if data is hidden too tightly, how can partners and regulators trust you?



How does traditional finance solve this? The bank vault is the answer—records of all transactions are kept, but ordinary people can't access them. Regulators, on the other hand, have permissions to review data but don't need to see every transaction detail. Early blockchain projects didn't think this through—they either made everything fully transparent like Bitcoin (all transaction information exposed) or extreme privacy (nothing visible).

Dusk's idea is different. To use an apt analogy, it’s like giving participants a safe with bulletproof glass. Your business secrets are securely locked inside, invisible to outsiders. But when proof is needed, you don't have to open the safe; instead, you can use specific cryptographic verification to convince others that there is indeed something inside—this is the core of "selective auditable privacy."

This scenario is easy to understand in practice. For example, an investment firm issuing private bonds—investors can see basic bond information and issuance terms, but sensitive data like holdings composition and specific transaction prices are only known to the trading parties. When auditors come to verify, they can confirm each transaction complies without knowing who bought what—privacy and compliance are both satisfied.

This kind of balance exists everywhere in reality. The question is whether blockchain can truly achieve this.
BTC-2.58%
DUSK42.16%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DeFiCaffeinatorvip
· 4h ago
This logic sounds good, but actually putting it on the chain is a different matter. Bulletproof glass sounds safe, but aren't there still many cases of privacy leaks?
View OriginalReply0
MetaMuskRatvip
· 4h ago
The analogy of a bulletproof glass safe is excellent, but to be honest, can selective auditability really work on-chain?
View OriginalReply0
0xSoullessvip
· 8h ago
Another perfect theoretical framework. But in reality? Large funds have already been playing this game behind the scenes, while retail investors are still reading the promotional materials.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketHustlervip
· 8h ago
Bulletproof glass safes are indeed a great analogy, but the key question is who will bear the implementation costs?
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsShamanvip
· 8h ago
The analogy of a bulletproof glass safe is excellent, but can it be achieved in reality?
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorervip
· 8h ago
The analogy of a bulletproof glass safe is perfect; finally, someone has explained this thoroughly.
View OriginalReply0
DuskSurfervip
· 8h ago
Bulletproof glass safes sound good, but I'm worried it might just become a new pretext...
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)