The forward PE ratio of the S&P 500 has soared to 22.2x, which is significantly above the 5-year average of 20.0x and far exceeds the 10-year average of 18.8x.



Breaking down FactSet data, before the pandemic, this index's forward PE generally hovered between 15-18x, only briefly spiking to 23x during the extreme easing in 2020. Now, with valuations approaching that level again, the safety margin is indeed quite tight.

But there's an interesting phenomenon—valuation increases are mainly concentrated in high-growth sectors like technology and consumer discretionary, where the forward PE approaches 28x. In contrast, traditional industries like energy and financials are only around 16x. In other words, although the overall index looks somewhat expensive, the internal "expensive and cheap" differentiation is quite stark, leaving plenty of room for funds to rotate from high-valuation leaders to undervalued sectors.

The key point is that profit growth in 2025 is still expected to maintain a 14-15% level. Under these circumstances, the index currently appears to be in a stage of "somewhat expensive but not yet a bubble."

Rather than heavily betting on passive index funds to continue rising, it's smarter to—moderately reduce the weight of high-valuation tech stocks, and shift towards undervalued assets like financials, energy, and small-cap value stocks. This approach can both hedge against 10-15% valuation corrections and seize excess returns through structural rotation.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PumpStrategistvip
· 6h ago
22.2x PE approaches the extreme loosening wave of 2020, the pattern has formed, but the divergence between tech at 28x and finance at 16x... this is where the opportunity lies. The rotation space is right here; rather than going all-in on passive indices, it's better to see where the chips are flowing. Is anyone still chasing the 28x tech? Typical rookie thinking—14-15% earnings growth can support the valuation but can't support greed. The low valuation of 16x in finance and energy is the interesting point; there is a lot of room for risk release. The index isn't in a bubble, but the structure has already differentiated like this. Smart money has long started rotating, yet some are still heavily invested in tech giants... see for yourself. The average before the pandemic was 15-18x. This wave's valuation correction of 10-15% is quite possible. Allocating to undervalued sectors early is the right approach.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHermitvip
· 6h ago
Look at this valuation divergence, with tech at 28x and energy at 16x. The rotation potential is indeed tempting. The 22.2x PE approaches the high levels seen during the pandemic, but with a 15% growth rate expected in 2025 as a safety net, a collapse isn't inevitable. Instead of all-in on tech giants, it's better to reduce tech holdings with the left hand and increase energy and financials with the right hand. That’s a smarter way to stay alive. Wait, can low-valuation sectors really outperform? Historically, tech has always been the life saver. But to be fair, structural rotation is indeed more reliable than simply betting on the index to rise.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroEnjoyervip
· 6h ago
A 22x PE is really a bit scary, but honestly, the 28x in the tech sector is truly outrageous. There are still opportunities to bottom fish in energy finance; this rotation cycle indeed presents chances.
View OriginalReply0
DaisyUnicornvip
· 6h ago
The 28x tech bloom is so dazzling, but the 16x energy sector is the real value hotspot. --- It sounds like high-valuation leaders should give way to undervalued assets; the rotation opportunity window is indeed there. --- The safety margin is tightening but profits can still be maintained. This balance point really tests stock-picking skills. --- The divergence is so large; instead of all-in on the index, it's better to do some structural rotation to avoid being trapped by the tech sector. --- 22x is indeed expensive, but it's much calmer compared to the crazy wave in 2020. --- Financial and energy sectors are undervalued to this extent, it feels like smart money is just waiting to scoop up the bottom. --- 10-15% adjustment risk vs. structural opportunities, whichever way you count, the latter is more valuable.
View OriginalReply0
StrawberryIcevip
· 6h ago
Technology stocks with a 28x PE... This round of rotation is coming, it's time to bottom fish in energy and finance.
View OriginalReply0
GasDevourervip
· 6h ago
Can the 22x PE still be played? Tech giants should consider reducing holdings. Energy and finance are indeed undervalued; rotation opportunities are coming. Profit growth still has 15% support, so it's not that pessimistic. Overvalued sectors should be sold off this round; shifting to finance and energy is the right move. PE has surged to 2020 levels; be cautious. With such significant structural differentiation, not buying the dip in undervalued stocks would be too foolish. Tech weights must be cut; finance and energy are the next favorites.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)