People keep misunderstanding what "crypto needs oversight" means. I wasn't talking about government regulation at all.



The real issue? Intermediaries keep multiplying in this space. When I point it out, folks dismiss it entirely. But isn't the whole point of crypto supposed to be cutting out the middleman?

Then there's this thing about Web3 transparency. Everyone jumps in with "it's all on-chain, mate." Fair point technically. Yet somehow the friction between theory and reality keeps growing. On-chain data exists, sure. But actual clarity? That's another beast.

The contradiction's getting harder to ignore. We built this thing to eliminate gatekeepers, yet gatekeepers are everywhere—just wearing different masks now.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketSurvivorvip
· 10h ago
The intermediary mechanisms are becoming more and more complex, which is essentially a new form of gatekeeping. I saw through it years ago.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecoveryvip
· 10h ago
ngl called this one years ago. middlemen in crypto aren't a bug, they're the inevitable feature nobody wanted to admit
Reply0
OnChainSleuthvip
· 10h ago
Well said. Intermediation is just putting old wine in new bottles; wearing a different mask to continue harvesting profits.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122vip
· 10h ago
Well said. Middlemen are indeed increasing, all under the guise of Web3.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)