In the current digital finance landscape, privacy and compliance seem like two parallel lines that will never meet. Traditional financial systems struggle to manage privacy effectively, while blockchain projects have faced numerous challenges in achieving compliance. However, there is a project that has been pondering how to solve this dilemma since its inception in 2018 — it’s called Dusk.



Simply put, Dusk aims to address the core pain points of financial institutions: transaction privacy and regulatory requirements. Can both be satisfied simultaneously?

Their approach is quite clever. By leveraging advanced cryptographic techniques like zero-knowledge proofs, transaction details are kept as a black box to the outside world, but transparent and auditable for authorized parties (such as regulators). This way, financial institutions can protect customer privacy while clearly demonstrating compliance — achieving two goals with one solution.

What’s even more interesting is their "selective disclosure" mechanism. Users can choose when, to whom, and which transaction information to disclose, without revealing their entire account history. This level of granular control is true privacy protection.

Nowadays, in the DeFi ecosystem, issues like front-end manipulation and strategy copying are becoming more common. Institutional investors want to participate but fear their strategies being exposed. Dusk provides them with an exit — asset management firms can quietly engage in liquidity mining, and banks can perform large transfers discreetly without causing market disturbances. These scenarios may sound a bit like a dream, but they are technically feasible.

From a higher perspective, the emergence of Dusk marks a new era in blockchain finance. It’s not about purely pursuing transparency nor solely hiding information, but about finding a balance between the two. The essence of finance is trust, which requires protecting individual financial privacy while maintaining the security and stability of the entire system. What Dusk aims to do is to be the practitioner of this balance.
DUSK43.45%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeLovervip
· 5h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are truly amazing; being able to handle both privacy and compliance at the same time is really a genius idea.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmarevip
· 5h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound great, but how many projects can really understand and implement them once they are actually applied... Dusk's approach is feasible, but the key still depends on whether the ecosystem can take off. Balancing privacy and compliance? It sounds like a win-win, but whether it actually works depends on regulatory attitudes. Institutions secretly mine, banks quietly transfer funds—if this can really be achieved, then some transaction proceeds might be in trouble haha. Zero-knowledge proofs are not a silver bullet, brother. Can this cryptographic technology really hold up? Selective disclosure mechanisms sound fancy, but will users really follow the rules, or will they still mess around? It's a bit of an overstatement. Since 2018, it's been quite a while—how's the ecosystem's enthusiasm? Brother, the balance point you're talking about—will it end up being unfavorable on both ends? DeFi truly needs such solutions, but whether Dusk can really break through is still early to tell.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropworkerZhangvip
· 5h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound quite advanced, but whether they can truly meet the practical needs of institutions in real-world applications remains to be seen. Can privacy and compliance be satisfied simultaneously? Just listen—do regulatory authorities really conduct such "transparent" audits? Selective disclosure mechanisms are good, but I'm worried it might just be another impressive-sounding system that can't actually be used. In DeFi, strategy copying is indeed annoying, but could Dusk's solution instead become a tool for institutions to hide and seek? It's been so long since 2018—why hasn't there been large-scale adoption? Is it really that difficult to implement? I agree that the essence of finance is trust, but the contradiction between privacy and transparency can't be fundamentally resolved, can it? Banking with discreet transfers sounds like a dream, but the key question is: will central banks of different countries agree? By the way, if balancing privacy and compliance is truly possible, why is this project so low-profile?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)