2026-01-18 17:38:15

A certain developer has achieved significant profits through multi-account arbitrage strategies. According to on-chain data tracking, this operation involves at least 7 related accounts, with a single account net profit of 2BNB and a total accumulated gain of approximately 14BNB, equivalent to over 13,000 RMB. From the transaction records of address 0x68e10947859408b248a43d8b0a47c34ba6387777, the strategy execution efficiency is not low. This type of multi-account coordinated arbitrage is not uncommon in the crypto space, reflecting that some participants have achieved good market returns through refined operations. It is worth noting that the underlying logic behind such operations—whether cross-chain arbitrage, liquidity mining optimization, or other trading modes—are all testing the operator's ability to grasp market timing and fund management.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

5 Likes

Reward
5
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MidnightGenesis

· 4h ago

On-chain data is out, and the arbitrage fox tail has been exposed. I've seen too many cases of 7 accounts linked together in coordinated operations. Based on past experience, such precision is usually achieved either through automated scripts or purely by quick reflexes, unsurprisingly. The interesting part is that while a 14BNB profit seems substantial, I am more interested in the gas fees and slippage costs, as the actual net profit might be seriously overestimated. From a coding perspective, this kind of multi-account arbitrage essentially tests nonce management and mempool prediction capabilities, and it's not as simple as it appears on the surface. Monitoring shows that the transaction frequency of this address is significantly higher at night, with obvious signs of deploying strategies late at night—typical of a rational engineering approach. It’s worth noting that whether such operations can be continuously reproduced depends mainly on whether the market liquidity has been drained by him, rather than just the profit figures.

View OriginalReply0

DegenTherapist

· 4h ago

14 BNB? Bro, I need to learn this trick.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 4h ago

14 BNB? Buddy, I've seen this trick before, it's just playing the transfer game. Those who are truly making money have already cashed out.

View OriginalReply0

DaoResearcher

· 4h ago

According to on-chain data, this guy's 7-account linkage strategy indeed touches on the incentive incompatibility issue in Token economics. Wait, the 14BNB return rate compared to the gas consumption of governance proposals, from a game theory perspective, simply doesn't hold. The essence reflected by this kind of arbitrage operation—assuming market efficiency holds—is actually something Vitalik has already empirically proven in his discussions on MEV. By the way, what's really interesting is that this multi-account strategy has survived until now. What does that imply? Either there are flaws in data tracking, or the market pricing mechanism itself has systemic defects.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 4h ago

Wow, seven accounts at once? That's a pretty aggressive pace.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 4h ago

Damn, this guy used a wave of 7 accounts to farm羊毛 and directly made 13,000. Why am I still losing...

View OriginalReply0