2026-01-18 18:25:59

Decentralized storage has always faced a longstanding challenge: how to ensure security while controlling costs. What is the traditional approach? Making multiple complete copies of files and storing them on different nodes. It sounds secure, but in reality, it’s extremely inefficient, with storage costs per TB per year being outrageously high.

There is a protocol that takes a different approach. It uses a set of mathematical schemes to split and disperse files across nodes worldwide. Even if some nodes encounter issues, the system can quickly restore the original data through mathematical calculations. The brilliance of this solution is that—storage costs are only a quarter of those of traditional methods, while maintaining bank-level fault tolerance and security.

Numbers speak for themselves. Many storage projects in the current market still have annual costs above $100 per TB. This protocol reduces the price to below $50 per TB. Compared to traditional cloud storage? It’s cheaper, yet retains all the ownership and control of decentralization. How significant is this difference? It’s enough to change the entire competitive landscape of the storage industry.

Application scenarios are expanding. AI training requires massive data storage, and gaming and video platforms consume bandwidth. These industries have been deterred by high costs. With costs coming down, these high-demand applications are motivated to migrate. It’s evolving from a geek toy into infrastructure—a very interesting transformation.

Technological innovation is often not about making things more complex. True breakthroughs simplify complex problems, reduce high costs, and make technology accessible to more people. If this approach can be reliably implemented, the landscape of the storage market could be reshuffled.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ShibaMillionairen't

· 5h ago

Damn, cutting costs by three-quarters? How did they come up with that math, talent indeed. --- $50 per TB sounds good, but can stability really be maximized, or is it just theoretical? --- I like the transition from geek toys to infrastructure, but I'm worried it might end up as a cannon fodder project. --- If AI large model training can really be applied, how huge is the market potential? Keep an eye on it. --- Can the mathematical distributed storage approach beat old players like Arweave? That's the key question. --- The cost advantage is clear, but the real issue is who dares to truly trust this thing with their data. --- Aren't we just hyping storage concepts again? There's too much hype in this track. --- It sounds good, but the real test is whether it can be implemented at scale. Small-scale testing and actual application are worlds apart. --- These giants in centralized cloud storage definitely can't sit still. They’ll either copy the technology or cut prices. Looks promising.

View OriginalReply0

HashBard

· 5h ago

so erasure coding finally making sense? 4x efficiency gains sound sick until mainnet hiccups remind you why web2 devs sleep better lol

Reply0

LiquidationWatcher

· 5h ago

ngl this erasure coding thing sounds nice on paper but... been there with "revolutionary" protocols that promised the moon. what's the real uptime data looking like? not the whitepaper version lol

Reply0

AirdropSweaterFan

· 5h ago

Whoa, $50 per TB? If it can truly run stably, traditional cloud storage will be crying to death. --- Mathematical schemes that break down data for fault tolerance? Sounds outrageous but also seems plausible; it depends on real benchmark data. --- Wait, if this really becomes infrastructure, those AI companies that were scared off will flock in. --- Half the cost per TB sounds great, but I care more about node stability and data retrieval speed—don't just hype the concept. --- From geek toys to infrastructure, I've heard this narrative several times; the key is implementation, not just hype. --- A quarter of the cost? The industry landscape will indeed change, but it will take time to truly move the market. --- The core idea is to use mathematics to trade for storage space—simple and straightforward, quite interesting. --- Sounds good in theory, but who guarantees those dispersed nodes are truly reliable? That's the real flaw. --- 50 vs 100, just a price war. Can the decentralized selling point really attract big companies? It depends on the ecosystem.

View OriginalReply0